PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
IMUSA Non Stick Fry Pan 12 Inches

Imusa · Cookware

IMUSA Non Stick Fry Pan 12 Inches

Bad

Avoid until the brand discloses what nonstick material it uses.

Verdict: SkipNon-stick coating chemistry undisclosed; PFAS risk unconfirmed but concerning. Use with caution and heat limits; avoid if manufacturer won't clarify.

IMUSA keeps the nonstick coating formula private on this 12-inch fry pan. Most nonstick cookware uses Teflon-type coating or Teflon-family coating, and this brand provides no proof otherwise.

The safe swap

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick 10-Piece Cookware Set

GreenPan

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick 10-Piece Cookware Set

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Non-stick coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (thermal decomposition)

If coating is Teflon-type coating-based and overheated above 500F, toxic fluorinated fumes (Teflon-type coating off-gas) can be released, causing polymer fume fever in humans and death in pet birds. IMUSA does not publish safe heating limits, so accidental overheating risk exists. This is a known hazard class for non-stick cookware generally, but specific to this model only if coating is Teflon-type coating.

70/ 100
🔩

Coating degradation and aluminum leaching

20/ 100
🍳

Ceramic or proprietary coating durability

Consumer reviews on retail sites (Amazon, Walmart) frequently cite rapid non-stick loss within months of use, suggesting either thin Teflon-type coating or ceramic-hybrid that wears quickly. Some users report food sticking after 6-12 months. This high failure rate indicates the coating may not be durable enough for long-term food safety assurance, independent of PFAS risk.

45/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed coating composition creating uncertainty

Lack of ingredient transparency is itself a hazard category: consumers cannot make informed decisions about heating safety, PFAS exposure, or replacement timing. This opacity is common in budget cookware but violates best-practice disclosure standards used by transparent brands.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No published recalls or test results for lead/cadmium in IMUSA non-stick cookware exist. If the non-stick layer includes ceramic or enamel components, regulatory standards (FDA, California Prop 65) limit heavy metals, but IMUSA does not publish compliance testing. Risk is not documented but also not ruled out by independent verification.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

IMUSA does not publicly specify whether this non-stick coating is Teflon-type coating-based (traditional Teflon), ceramic, or a proprietary formulation. This opacity is the core safety issue: Teflon-type coating coatings can release toxic fumes if overheated (above 500F), while ceramic and newer formulations carry different degradation profiles. The pan body is typically aluminum, which conducts heat efficiently but can leach if the non-stick layer degrades or if acidic foods are cooked at high temperatures. Without material disclosure, you cannot verify heating safety limits or coating durability.

The brand's record and disclosure

IMUSA is a long-established kitchenware brand (founded 1960s, Dominican Republic based) but maintains minimal public disclosure on non-stick coating chemistry or manufacturing certifications. No published PFAS statements, third-party testing results, or responses to consumer inquiries about coating composition are readily available. The brand has not published recalls specific to this 12-inch fry pan model for coating failure or fume events, but absence of recalls does not confirm safety. This silence makes independent verification of PFAS or other synthetic coating hazards impossible.

How it compares in its category

IMUSA non-stick pans are budget-tier cookware (typically USD 15-30), comparable to store brands at Walmart or Target. They undercut premium non-stick brands (Calphalon, T-Fal) that publish coating specs and certifications, and lack the transparency of ceramic-coated or cast-iron alternatives. For the price point, IMUSA offers reasonable heat distribution, but the trade-off is reduced disclosure. Consumers choosing this tier typically accept higher replacement frequency (2-3 years vs. 5+ for premium) in exchange for lower upfront cost.

If you buy it

Never exceed medium heat (around 350-375F) unless the manufacturer confirms the coating can safely reach higher temperatures; most non-stick coatings begin degrading or off-gassing above 500F. Hand-wash only; avoid high-heat stovetop cleaning and dishwasher cycles that degrade coatings faster. Inspect the surface monthly for peeling, flaking, or discoloration; discard immediately if coating visibly separates. Replace every 2-3 years or sooner if non-stick performance drops sharply, as this indicates coating breakdown and potential aluminum contact with food.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Imusa has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.