PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall7/ 100Bad
Instant Pot Duo Plus Pressure Cooker

Instant Pot · Pressure Cookers

Instant Pot Duo Plus Pressure Cooker

Bad

Low risk likely, but vague inner-pot coating represents a gap.

Verdict · SkipStainless steel body is chemically stable; inner coating composition unspecified but no recalls reported; standard pressure-cooker safety record with proper use.

The Duo Plus is built from stainless steel, a lower-concern material. However, Instant Pot doesn't publicly disclose the inner cooking pot's non-stick coating composition, which may contain Teflon-family coating.

The better-graded swap

Presto 23 Quart Induction Pressure Canner

Presto

Presto 23 Quart Induction Pressure Canner

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

stainless steel body; inner cooking pot coating unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed as non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

60/ 100
🔩

Aluminum leaching (if inner pot is aluminum)

Inner pot composition is not disclosed; if it is aluminum, cooking acidic foods could cause trace metal migration, though risk is low under normal pressure-cooking conditions and short residence times.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and unknown coating composition

The inner pot coating material is not specified by Instant Pot. Over years of use, scratches or wear could expose underlying metal; without knowing the coating type, long-term safety cannot be fully assessed.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Gasket and seal material off-gassing

The silicone sealing ring can absorb odors and flavors but has not been reported to leach harmful compounds; replacement gaskets are readily available and recommended every 12-24 months of heavy use.

95/ 100

Thermal stress and material failure

No recalls or documented failure modes related to the stainless steel body or sealing integrity under rated pressure; proper maintenance and adherence to pressure limits mitigates this risk.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Stainless steel used in food-contact cookware is food-grade and does not migrate detectable quantities of chromium or nickel into food under normal cooking conditions; this is an established safety standard.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Instant Pot Duo Plus has a stainless steel outer body and heating base, both chemically inert under normal cooking temperatures. The inner cooking pot material and its coating are not publicly detailed by Instant Pot, which creates a transparency gap. Stainless steel pots themselves do not leach lead, cadmium, or problematic metals under typical food cooking conditions. The unspecified inner coating is the primary concern area for this model, though no chemical migration incidents have been documented in available public records.

The brand's record and disclosure

Instant Pot has maintained a stable consumer safety reputation since market entry and does not face major product liability cases related to chemical leaching. The company does not publicly disclose the composition of the inner cooking pot coating, which limits independent verification of safety claims. No formal certifications (NSF, FDA material compliance statements) are publicly highlighted for this model. The brand has not faced significant regulatory action or recalls tied to cookware material composition.

How it compares in its category

Pressure cookers in this price range (budget to mid-market) typically use stainless steel or aluminum with unspecified non-stick or protective coatings. The Instant Pot Duo Plus competes well on build durability and has a longer consumer track record than many competitors. Higher-end models sometimes include explicit ceramic or bare stainless inner surfaces with published food-contact certifications. The Duo Plus sits in the middle ground, solid stainless exterior but with a coating transparency issue shared by many mainstream brands.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged storage of acidic foods (tomato sauce, vinegar, citrus) in the cooker after cooking; transfer to glass or ceramic containers. Do not exceed the pressure-rated limits or use it on very high heat settings outside normal pressure-cooking operation. Inspect the inner pot sealing ring annually and replace if discolored, cracked, or loses flexibility. Avoid abrasive scrubbers on the inner coating; hand-wash gently or use the dishwasher-safe setting if the manual confirms the inner pot can tolerate dishwasher cleaning.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Instant Pot has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Pressure Cookers

Instant Pot Mini Chef Series 4QT Multi-Cooker

Instant Pot

Mini Chef Series 4QT Multi-Cooker

Stainless steel pot/bowl, no nonstick coating disclosed

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade59Good

Sealing ring degradation and odor absorption

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Stainless steel surface pitting and corrosion

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Pressure release valve clogging

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal injury from steam or pressure release

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Stainless steel pot with no nonstick coating on record.

Starting grade for this product type

T-Fal 6qt Stainless Steel Pressure Cooker with Straining Basket

T-fal

6qt Stainless Steel Pressure Cooker with Straining Basket

Stainless steel body and lid

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade57Good

Gasket and sealing ring degradation

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Stainless steel minor pitting and corrosion

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Pressure release valve blockage or malfunction

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Stainless steel pressure cooker with no nonstick coating or known treatments.

Starting grade for this product type

T-fal Secure Trendy Stainless Steel Pressure Cooker

T-fal

Secure Trendy Stainless Steel Pressure Cooker

stainless steel body, no nonstick coating

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade59Good

Silicone gasket degradation and odor

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Stainless steel corrosion and pitting

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Pressure release valve blockage

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Stainless steel pressure cookers carry minimal Teflon-family coating risk, though T-fal offers no transparency.

Starting grade for this product type

More pressure cookers grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.