The Best Non-Toxic Pressure Cookers of 2026
6 of the 15 pressure cookers PFAS Authority has graded score below its 70 point pass mark for PFAS and other toxins, 40% of the category, as of November 2026, leaving 9 that pass. The highest graded is Presto Nationalpresto Presto Pressure Cooker and Canner 01755 at 75 out of 100.
Every grade below is built from published materials, ingredient lists, certifications and brand disclosures, scored on one public rubric and ranked best-graded first. Each score links to the full breakdown of what earned it, and the numbers across the whole dataset are published too.
Are pressure cookers non-toxic?
9 of the 15 pressure cookers we graded clear our screen and 6 do not. Non-toxic is not a defined or regulated term, so what we can tell you is what our graders recorded. Beyond PFAS, the hazards found or left unruled-out on pressure cookers in this category are aluminium leaching, VOCs and off-gassing, heavy metals. The highest graded here is Presto Nationalpresto Presto Pressure Cooker and Canner 01755 at 75 out of 100.
Quick picks
Best overall
Presto Nationalpresto Presto Pressure Cooker and Canner 01755Highest PFAS grade in the category
75 Excellent
A second brand to consider
Instant Pot Mini Chef Series 4QT Multi-CookerThe best grade here from a brand other than the winner
75 Excellent
Why Presto Nationalpresto Presto Pressure Cooker wins, and what it beats
Every grade on this page is one sum. A category starts from a baseline, each disclosed material or coating adds risk points, and each thing the brand or a third party has published takes them away. Below is that sum for the winner, then for 2 products it beats, so you can see exactly where the 60 points between the top and the bottom of this pressure cookers ranking come from.
The winner
Made of stainless steel body; no nonstick coating.
- +30Category baseline. The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
- +15No PFAS disclosure. No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
- -20Bare uncoated material. Recorded as a bare, uncoated material with no surface coating or treatment.
25risk points in total, which is a grade of 75
What the grade does not fix. It still carries one risk factor, No PFAS disclosure, and our graders recorded 2 other hazards on it. See the full breakdown.
What it beats, and why
What puts it behind. The winner earns -20 points for Bare uncoated material. We found nothing comparable published for this product.
Made of aluminum body, stainless steel lid and interior surfaces.
- +30Category baseline
- +15No PFAS disclosure
- -10Base material not linked to PFAS. The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
35risk points, a grade of 65
What puts it behind. Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed, +40 points. Marketed as non-stick without stating the coating chemistry. The winner carries no such factor.
Made of stainless steel body; inner cooking pot coating unspecified.
- +40Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed
- +30Category baseline
- +15No PFAS disclosure
85risk points, a grade of 15
No product on this page was physically tested by us. Every number above comes from published materials, ingredient and coating disclosures, certifications and brand statements, scored on one public rubric. Formulations change without notice, so check the current product listing before buying.
What to watch for in pressure cookers
Beyond the PFAS grade, these are the things our graders recorded on the 15 pressure cookers in this category. We assess from materials, brand statements and published research. We do not lab-test.
- Aluminium leaching
Aluminium migrating out of cookware, bakeware or an antiperspirant into food or skin.
Plausible but unconfirmed on 6 more, meaning nobody has ruled it out. ATSDR
- VOCs and off-gassing
Volatile compounds that evaporate out of a material at room temperature, which is what a new product smell is.
Plausible but unconfirmed on 2 more, meaning nobody has ruled it out. EPA
- Heavy metals
Metals such as antimony, nickel and chromium migrating from a material into what touches it.
Plausible but unconfirmed on 1 more, meaning nobody has ruled it out. ATSDR
The safest pressure cookers we graded, lowest PFAS risk first
- 1
Highest grade here
- stainless steel body; no nonstick coating
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Gasket and sealing material degradation
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon - 2
- Stainless steel pot/bowl, no nonstick coating disclosed
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Sealing ring degradation and odor absorption
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon - 3
- Stainless steel and aluminum construction
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Aluminum leaching in acidic foods
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- 4
- stainless steel 6-quart pressure cooker vessel
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Stainless steel leaching (nickel, chromium)
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon - 5
- Stainless steel body and lid
- Gasket and sealing ring degradation
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon - 6
- stainless steel body, no nonstick coating
- Silicone gasket degradation and odor
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon - 7
- Stainless steel cooking vessel; sealed electric heating element
- Silicone sealing ring degradation
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon - 8
- Stainless steel inner pot, electric heating base
- Pressure release valve clogging
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
All the pressure cookers that pass, side by side
Sorted by score. A higher score means lower PFAS risk.
| # | Pressure Cookers | Score | Rating | Made of | Key concern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Presto Nationalpresto Presto Pressure Cooker and Canner 01755 | 75 | Excellent | stainless steel body; no nonstick coating | Gasket and sealing material degradation |
| 2 | Instant Pot Mini Chef Series 4QT Multi-Cooker | 75 | Excellent | Stainless steel pot/bowl, no nonstick coating disclosed | Sealing ring degradation and odor absorption |
| 3 | Presto 23 Quart Induction Pressure Canner | 75 | Excellent | Stainless steel and aluminum construction | Aluminum leaching in acidic foods |
| 4 | Presto Cookware 6 Qt. S/S Pressure Cooker | 75 | Excellent | stainless steel 6-quart pressure cooker vessel | Stainless steel leaching (nickel, chromium) |
| 5 | T-Fal 6qt Stainless Steel Pressure Cooker with Straining Basket | 75 | Excellent | Stainless steel body and lid | Gasket and sealing ring degradation |
| 6 | T-fal Secure Trendy Stainless Steel Pressure Cooker | 75 | Excellent | stainless steel body, no nonstick coating | Silicone gasket degradation and odor |
| 7 | Cuisinart CPC-600 6 Qt Electric Pressure Cooker | 75 | Excellent | Stainless steel cooking vessel; sealed electric heating element | Silicone sealing ring degradation |
| 8 | Cuisinart CPC-900 6 Quart High Pressure Multicooker | 75 | Excellent | Stainless steel inner pot, electric heating base | Pressure release valve clogging |
The verdict on pressure cookers
Presto Nationalpresto Presto Pressure Cooker and Canner 01755 grades 75 out of 100, the highest here. It is stainless steel body; no nonstick coating. We found no PFAS statement from the brand, so the grade rests on materials alone.
Choose Instant Pot Mini Chef Series 4QT Multi-Cooker instead if you want a second option at 75 out of 100, stainless steel pot/bowl, no nonstick coating disclosed.
We hold no price data, so nothing here is a budget recommendation. Grades are model-based assessments from published materials and disclosures, not laboratory tests.
The pressure cookers we would skip
Lowest scoring in this category, worst first, with the reason.
- 15Instant Pot Duo Plus Pressure CookerBad
Aluminum leaching (if inner pot is aluminum)
- 15Presto 06003 Multicooker SteamerBad
Nonstick coating identity and degradation risk
- 15Presto Electric Pressure Cooker 6QtBad
Nonstick coating degradation and inhalation (Teflon-type coating fume risk)
What we check on pressure cookers
- Confirmed PFAS, PTFE or fluoropolymer content, which is the heaviest penalty we apply.
- Stain, water or grease resistant treatments, which usually mean fluorinated chemistry.
- Whether the brand discloses what is in the product, or stays silent behind a “clean” claim.
- Independent lab results and certifications where they exist.
Full point-by-point rubric on the methodology page.
The pressure cookers brands we found no PFAS statement from
We found no PFAS statement from 2 of the brands here. That is our research, not proof a brand has never said anything, and it is not evidence of harm. It is why none of them score well on disclosure.
Instant Pot, Presto.
The brands that have published something, and what each of them actually said, are in our record of what every brand has said about PFAS.
Common questions about PFAS in pressure cookers
Are pressure cookers PFAS free?
6 of the 15 pressure cookers PFAS Authority has graded score below its 70 point pass mark for PFAS and other toxins, 40% of the category, as of November 2026, leaving 9 that pass. The highest graded is Presto Nationalpresto Presto Pressure Cooker and Canner 01755 at 75 out of 100. The lowest graded is Instant Pot Duo Plus Pressure Cooker at 15 out of 100.
Are pressure cookers non-toxic?
9 of the 15 pressure cookers we graded clear our screen and 6 do not. Non-toxic is not a defined or regulated term, so what we can tell you is what our graders recorded. Beyond PFAS, the hazards found or left unruled-out on pressure cookers in this category are aluminium leaching, VOCs and off-gassing, heavy metals. The highest graded here is Presto Nationalpresto Presto Pressure Cooker and Canner 01755 at 75 out of 100.
Which are the safest pressure cookers to buy?
On our grades, Presto Nationalpresto Presto Pressure Cooker and Canner 01755 at 75 out of 100, which we band as Excellent. Then Instant Pot Mini Chef Series 4QT Multi-Cooker at 75. These are model-based assessments from published materials, ingredient lists, certifications and disclosures, not laboratory tests, so treat them as the lowest risk we can evidence rather than a safety guarantee.
Which pressure cookers grade best for PFAS?
Presto Nationalpresto Presto Pressure Cooker and Canner 01755, at 75 out of 100, which we band as Excellent. It is stainless steel body; no nonstick coating. The runner up is Instant Pot Mini Chef Series 4QT Multi-Cooker at 75.
Which pressure cookers should I avoid?
The three lowest scoring we hold are Instant Pot Duo Plus Pressure Cooker at 15, Presto 06003 Multicooker Steamer at 15, Presto Electric Pressure Cooker 6Qt at 15. The problem with the first is that low risk likely, but vague inner-pot coating represents a gap.
Which pressure cookers brands have not published a PFAS statement?
We found no PFAS statement from 2 of the brands we scored in this category, including Instant Pot, Presto. That is what our research turned up, not proof a brand has never said anything, and a missing statement is not evidence of harm. It is the reason those brands cannot score well on disclosure.
Do you lab test pressure cookers?
No. We score from published ingredient lists, materials, certifications, disclosures and third party lab results where they exist. Where a product has been independently tested we use that result and say so.
More kitchen and cooking categories we have graded
Same rubric, same scale. These are the categories closest to pressure cookers.
- Best non-toxic cookware312 graded
- Best non-toxic parchment paper275 graded
- Best non-toxic air fryers231 graded
- Best non-toxic bakeware168 graded
- Best non-toxic non-stick knife sets15 graded
- Best non-toxic nonstick saucepans15 graded
- Best non-toxic roasting pans15 graded
- Best non-toxic stainless steel cookware15 graded
Get the graded list, free.
The products we score each week, and the best-graded alternative in every category.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Does a particular brand of pressure cookers have PFAS?
We also wrote this up at length. PFAS in Pressure Cookers, Which Brands Grade Best and Worst
Want to filter the whole category yourself? Browse all 15 pressure cookers.