6-Quart Programmable Electric Pressure Cooker Plus
High risk. Skip until Presto discloses coating composition or certifies PFAS-free.
Presto's cooker uses a nonstick-coated lid and inner surfaces, but the company doesn't publicly disclose the coating's chemical composition or PFAS status. Third-party verification is unavailable.
The better-graded swap
Presto
Presto 23 Quart Induction Pressure Canner
75/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Stainless steel body with unspecified nonstick-coated lid/inner surfaces
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What 6-Quart Programmable Pressure Cooker is made of, ingredients and materials
This unit has a stainless steel outer body and pressure vessel, which do not leach or degrade under normal use. The inner cooking surface and lid are coated with an unspecified nonstick finish. Presto has not publicly disclosed the chemistry of this coating, leaving uncertainty about whether it contains Teflon-type coating (Teflon) or PFAS-based alternatives. Nonstick coatings can release fumes if overheated or scratched, and composition matters for both acute and chronic safety.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed
Marketed as non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.
Nonstick coating degradation and inhalation risk
Composition of the nonstick finish is unspecified. If it contains Teflon-type coating or PFAS analogs, overheating (>400F), mechanical damage, or prolonged high-pressure cycling could release fumes or particulates. Risk is manageable with proper care but unquantified without disclosure.
Thermal stress on coating integrity
Pressure cookers subject inner surfaces to repeated high heat and pressure cycles. Nonstick coatings can develop microfractures over time, especially if coating quality or adhesion is substandard. Presto does not publish durability or coating thickness specifications for this model.
What’s reassuring
Stainless steel seals and gasket materials
Pressure cooker seals are typically silicone or rubber. No recalls or contamination reports specific to this Presto model's gasket materials have been documented. Standard maintenance (annual replacement) should mitigate any leaching risk.
Aluminum exposure from inner vessel
If the inner cooking surface is aluminum beneath the nonstick coat, and coating degrades, direct aluminum-food contact could occur. Presto does not specify substrate material. Stainless steel substrate is more likely given product tier, but confirmation is absent.
Heavy metals
Electrical pressure cookers use heating coils and thermostats; no specific contamination reports exist for this Presto model. Standard manufacturing oversight applies, but third-party testing data are unavailable.
Source, FDA ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Presto has not issued public statements about PFAS in pressure cookers or disclosed nonstick coating formulations. The company has not sought PFOA-free or PFAS-free certifications for this model. No major product recalls specifically targeting PFAS or coating safety have been issued for this line, but silence on material composition is the core issue. Competitors like Instant Pot and some Cuisinart models have begun disclosing Teflon-type coating-free or PFAS-free status, making Presto's lack of transparency unusual.
How it compares in its category
Electric pressure cookers vary widely in coating disclosure. Premium brands (Instant Pot, some Cuisinart models) explicitly state Teflon-type coating-free or PFAS-free coatings. Presto's 6-quart model sits in the mid-market price range but lags in transparency. Stainless steel alternatives without nonstick surfaces exist but are less convenient and harder to clean. Presto's silence puts this model at a disadvantage relative to competitors with clear chemical profiles.
If you buy it
Avoid exposing the inner nonstick surface to temperatures above manufacturer specs (typically 400F dry, lower under pressure). Hand wash the lid and cooking pot gently; abrasive scrubbing or dishwasher use can degrade the coating and trigger peeling or potential fume release. Inspect the coating regularly for scratches, peeling, or discoloration. If coating integrity is compromised, replace the lid or inner pot to prevent inhalation of coating particles. Request coating composition from Presto customer service before purchase if PFAS status is a concern.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Presto has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to 6-Quart Programmable Electric Pressure Cooker Plus?
- stainless steel body; no nonstick coating
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Gasket and sealing material degradation
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon- Stainless steel pot/bowl, no nonstick coating disclosed
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Sealing ring degradation and odor absorption
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon- Stainless steel and aluminum construction
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Aluminum leaching in acidic foods
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More pressure cookers grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.