PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall10/ 100Bad
Jason Markk Repel Spray

Jason Markk · Shoe Waterproofing Sprays

Jason Markk Repel Spray

Poor

Skip until brand discloses or tests for PFAS in this waterproofing spray.

Verdict · SkipPFAS content undisclosed and likely present in water-repellent formulation; non-PFAS hazards minor if use instructions followed; brand transparency needed before upgrade.

This water-repellent protective treatment for shoes and textiles has no PFAS disclosure or third-party testing. Given the spray's waterproofing function, PFAS content is a material concern.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Proprietary water-repellent spray coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Jason Markk Repel Spray is made of, ingredients and materials

Jason Markk Repel is a proprietary spray-on water-repellent coating for footwear, designed to bead water off shoe surfaces. The exact chemical formulation is not publicly disclosed by the brand. Given that durable water-repellency in consumer sprays typically relies on fluorinated compounds (PFAS family members like Teflon-type coating or polyfluoroalkyl substances), this product's silence on composition is the primary concern. The spray is applied as an aerosol, meaning inhalation exposure during application is a realistic exposure pathway.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
⚠️

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from solvent carriers

Aerosol spray formulations require volatile solvents for dispersal and quick drying. Inhalation of spray mist can cause headache, dizziness, and respiratory irritation during application; ventilation is essential to minimize exposure.

20/ 100
♾️

PFAS

If the proprietary formulation contains Teflon-type coating or other fluorinated polymers for water-repellency (likely but unconfirmed), inhaling dried particles or aerosol residue may expose lungs to materials with unknown long-term safety profiles in humans. This hazard is conditional on the undisclosed formula.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Aerosol propellant effects on respiratory system

Some aerosol propellants can irritate airways or trigger bronchospasm in sensitive individuals, particularly those with asthma. The brand does not specify propellant type.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin and eye contact irritation

Spray mist can contact skin and eyes during application. Solvent-based formulations typically cause mild to moderate irritation; no specific incident reports exist for this product, but contact with eyes or mucous membranes should be avoided and rinsed immediately.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Microplastic shedding from dried coating layer

Water-repellent spray coatings can degrade and shed microparticles into the environment with repeated foot flexion and rain exposure. No published data exists on microplastic release from Jason Markk Repel specifically, but this is a known issue in the category.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Jason Markk has not published safety data sheets, ingredient lists, or third-party PFAS testing results for this product in publicly available sources. The brand markets itself as a sneaker care specialist but has not made public commitments to PFAS-free formulations or transparency standards common in eco-focused footwear brands. No major recalls or safety incidents have been documented for this specific spray. The lack of disclosure is the defining gap rather than a documented violation.

How it compares in its category

Waterproofing sprays for shoes exist across a wide spectrum, some brands (e.g., Crep Protect, Scotchgard) also lack full PFAS disclosure but have longer market histories; others emphasize wax-based or silicone-based alternatives that avoid fluorinated chemistry. Jason Markk Repel sits in the middle of the market by reputation and pricing but offers no competitive advantage in safety transparency. If water-repellency is your priority and PFAS concern is secondary, competing products with similar or worse disclosure exist; if transparency is the driver, several smaller brands offer plant-based or PFOA-free claims.

If you buy it

Apply in a well-ventilated space or outdoors to minimize aerosol inhalation. Follow the brand's dry-time guidance (typically 24 hours before shoe use) to allow solvents to evaporate. Reapply every 3 to 6 months depending on wear and weather exposure; more frequent application increases cumulative inhalation risk. Store away from heat and ignition sources. If you are pregnant, have respiratory sensitivities, or live with young children, request a safety data sheet from the brand before purchase; their silence suggests one does not exist publicly.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Jason Markk has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Jason Markk Repel Spray?

NikWax Fabric & Leather Duo-Pack

Nikwax

Fabric & Leather Duo-Pack

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Fabric and leather waterproofing treatment (wax-based)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in spray carrier

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Nikwax Fabric & Leather Proof Spray

Nikwax

Fabric & Leather Proof Spray

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Proprietary water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment on fabric and leather
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Inhalation exposure from aerosol application

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
NikWax Waterproofing Spray

Nikwax

Waterproofing Spray

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Solvent-based or water-based waterproofing treatment (formula not publicly disclosed)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and solvent inhalation

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More shoe waterproofing sprays grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.