Kat Von D Beauty · Foundation & Primer
KVD Beauty Good Apple Skin Perfecting Foundation Balm
Lower concern cosmetic. Brand silent on PFAS, no red flags identified.
This foundation balm contains typical cosmetic ingredients without obvious PFAS-associated additives like Teflon-type coating or water/stain repellents. No public lab data or brand disclosure available on PFAS content.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
pigments, oils, waxes, polymers in cosmetic balm formulation
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
Aqua Pure
3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
What KVD Beauty Good Apple Skin Perfecting is made of, ingredients and materials
Good Apple is a pigmented balm foundation combining waxes, oils, and polymers to create a cream-to-powder finish. The pigment load (iron oxides, mica, titanium dioxide) is typical for color cosmetics and generally recognized as safe at cosmetic concentrations. Balm formulations rely on occlusive oils and waxes rather than water, which reduces microbial growth risk but means the product is not designed for extended wear in high-heat environments (e.g., direct sunlight, intense exercise). No talc is listed in ingredient disclosures for this line, reducing inhalation concern.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components
The product contains fragrance listed as 'fragrance (parfum)' on the label but does not break down individual fragrance allergens (e.g., limonene, citral, eugenol). Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or a history of contact dermatitis should review full INCI disclosure or contact brand support for detailed fragrance composition.
Polymer degradation and microplastic shedding over time
The polymers in the balm (e.g., silicones, acrylates if present) may shed microparticles if the product is exposed to heat, freeze-thaw cycles, or extended shelf life. Cosmetic-grade polymers are not classified as intentional microplastics, but physical degradation is possible if stored improperly. No manufacturer guidance on maximum storage time is published for this line.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Lead
Iron oxides and titanium dioxide used in this balm are well-established colorants with no documented contamination reports for Kat Von D or this product line. FDA regulates colorant purity in cosmetics, and no recalls or lab findings for this foundation are on record.
Source, ATSDR ↗Formaldehyde / VOCs
No formaldehyde releasers (e.g., imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin) are listed in available ingredient disclosures for this product. Standard preservatives in balm formulations are typically phenoxyethanol or plant-derived systems, which do not release formaldehyde.
Source, ATSDR ↗1,4-dioxane contamination in polymers and surfactants
Balm formulations do not typically contain ethoxylated surfactants that carry 1,4-dioxane risk. No laboratory testing or regulatory findings have flagged this product for 1,4-dioxane. Risk is inherently low for balm texture versus emulsion-based foundations.
The full breakdown
The brand's record and disclosure
Kat Von D Beauty has not published detailed PFAS or flame-retardant disclosures, and the brand does not prominently advertise third-party certifications (e.g., Clean Beauty, Leaping Bunny). The brand operates under parent company Kendo Beauty (LVMH). No widespread recalls or banned-ingredient violations have been documented for this foundation line. The brand has faced past scrutiny over fragrance transparency but has since improved ingredient listing on product pages.
How it compares in its category
Balm foundations are inherently lower-risk than spray or powder formulations because they do not generate inhalable particles and do not require aerosol propellants. This product sits in the mid-to-premium segment; comparable balm foundations (e.g., Bobbi Brown Skin Foundation Balm, MAC Face & Body) share similar pigment and polymer chemistry with no documented safety differentiators. The Good Apple line is not marketed as hypoallergenic or dermatologically tested, so sensitive-skin users should patch-test before full application.
If you buy it
Apply with clean fingers or damp sponge to avoid bacterial introduction into the balm pot; replace after 12 months of regular use or if odor changes. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat and sunlight to prevent polymer degradation and color shifting. Do not apply to skin immediately after intense heat exposure or heavy sweating, as the occlusive base may trap moisture and promote irritation. Discontinue use if redness, itching, or burning develops; perform a 48-hour patch test on inner arm if you have a history of fragrance or preservative sensitivity.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Kat Von D Beauty has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Better-graded alternatives in Foundation & Primer
Bare Minerals
bareMinerals Original Prime Time Foundation Primer
- mineral powder, silicones, mica
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Fragrance allergen sensitization
Bare Minerals
bareMinerals Prime Time Daily Protecting Primer SPF 30
- mineral powder, silica, mica, talc
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Talc inhalation
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Bare Minerals
bareMinerals Prime Time Hydrate & Glow Primer
- mineral pigments, glycerin, plant extracts, silicones
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
More foundation & primer grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.