15/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
KitchenAid Tri-Ply Stainless Steel Nonstick Skillet

Kitchenaid · Cookware

KitchenAid Tri-Ply Stainless Steel Nonstick Skillet

F · High PFAS

Nonstick coating composition unknown; KitchenAid does not disclose PFAS status.

Verdict: SkipNonstick composition undisclosed; stainless steel base is safe, but coating degradation and unknown PFAS status require careful use and monitoring.

KitchenAid's nonstick skillet uses unspecified coating chemistry with no PFAS disclosure or third-party verification. Safer stainless or ceramic alternatives exist if PFAS avoidance is a priority.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Stainless steel with nonstick coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

KitchenAid Tri-Ply Stainless Steel Nonstick Skillets use a stainless steel core (typically 18/8 or 18/10 chromium-nickel alloy) bonded to aluminum and copper layers for heat distribution. The nonstick coating type is not publicly specified by KitchenAid on product labels or their website. Since the 1980s, most commercial nonstick cookware has used Teflon-type coating (Teflon) or similar Teflon-family coating, though some newer lines claim Teflon-type coating-free alternatives; without explicit disclosure, Teflon-type coating presence cannot be ruled out.

The brand's record and disclosure

KitchenAid (owned by Whirlpool Corporation) does not publicly disclose PFAS use, coating chemistry, or testing data for this product line. The brand has not published statements committing to PFAS-free formulations or third-party certifications (such as GreenGuard or NSF). No recalls or safety controversies specific to this skillet model are on record in FDA or CPSC databases, but silence on coating composition limits independent verification of safety claims.

How it compares in its category

KitchenAid's tri-ply construction is mid-to-premium in the stainless steel nonstick segment. Competitors like All-Clad, Calphalon, and Le Creuset vary widely in coating transparency: some disclose Teflon-type coating-free status (e.g., Caraway, Our Place), while most mass-market brands (including KitchenAid, Calphalon, T-fal) remain silent. The tri-ply design itself is durable and heat-distributing; the coating uncertainty is the differentiator.

If you buy it

Never heat an empty pan or exceed medium-high heat, as nonstick coatings can degrade and emit fumes above 400-500°F (exact threshold depends on undisclosed coating type). Hand wash only; dishwasher use and metal utensils accelerate coating wear. Inspect the cooking surface regularly for peeling, discoloration, or flaking; discard the pan if damage appears. Replace within 3-5 years or sooner if coating visibly degrades, especially if the composition remains unknown and you want to minimize exposure.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Teflon-type coating fume risk (thermal degradation)

If the nonstick coating is Teflon-type coating-based (not disclosed), overheating above 500°F can release polymer fumes causing acute respiratory symptoms (flu-like). KitchenAid does not specify coating type, so risk cannot be quantified; users must assume standard precautions (no preheating empty, medium heat max).

Likely

Coating degradation and flaking

All nonstick coatings wear with use. Dishwasher use, high heat, and metal utensils accelerate peeling. Flaked coating particles may be ingested; while not acutely toxic, chronic ingestion of unknown polymers is poorly studied in humans.

None known

Aluminum leaching

The aluminum core is bonded between stainless steel and the nonstick layer, so direct contact with food is prevented. Leaching is not a documented concern for tri-ply construction if the outer coating remains intact.

None known

Lead or cadmium in coating or base

Stainless steel and modern nonstick coatings do not intentionally contain lead or cadmium. No recalls or testing data suggest contamination in this product line; standard cookware safety applies.

Possible

PFAS in nonstick coating (separate assessment)

Composition unknown. PFAS are common in Teflon-type coating-based coatings; KitchenAid's silence on this issue is the primary concern. See PFAS grade (15/100) for full analysis.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

Tramontina Professional 12-Inch Ceramic Fry Pan

Tramontina

Professional 12-Inch Ceramic Fry Pan

Ceramic nonstick coating

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated4 flags

Ceramic cookware carries lower PFAS risk than Teflon-type coating, but verify coating origin.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.