PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
KitchenAid Tri-Ply Stainless Steel Nonstick Skillet

Kitchenaid · Cookware

KitchenAid Tri-Ply Stainless Steel Nonstick Skillet

Bad

Nonstick coating chemistry not stated, brand has no PFAS statement on record.

Verdict · SkipNonstick composition undisclosed; stainless steel base has no hazard of this kind on record, but coating degradation and unknown PFAS status require careful use and monitoring.

This skillet has a nonstick coating whose chemistry is not stated. KitchenAid has no PFAS statement on record for this product. No third-party testing or certification is available.

The better-graded swap

Made In Stainless Clad Frying Pan Set 3-Piece Professional-Grade 5-Layer Metal Construction

Made In

Made In Stainless Clad Frying Pan Set 3-Piece Professional-Grade 5-Layer Metal Construction

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Stainless steel with nonstick coating, composition unspecified

Lab data

No public lab test

Is KitchenAid Tri-Ply Stainless Steel non-toxic? What it is made of

KitchenAid Tri-Ply Stainless Steel Nonstick Skillets use a stainless steel core (typically 18/8 or 18/10 chromium-nickel alloy) bonded to aluminum and copper layers for heat distribution. The nonstick coating type is not publicly specified by KitchenAid on product labels or their website. Since the 1980s, most commercial nonstick cookware has used Teflon-type coating (Teflon) or similar Teflon-family coating, though some newer lines claim Teflon-type coating-free alternatives; without explicit disclosure, Teflon-type coating presence cannot be ruled out.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed as non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

60/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (thermal degradation)

If the nonstick coating is Teflon-type coating-based (not disclosed), overheating above 500°F can release polymer fumes causing acute respiratory symptoms (flu-like). KitchenAid does not specify coating type, so risk cannot be quantified; users must assume standard precautions (no preheating empty, medium heat max).

70/ 100
🍂

Coating degradation and flaking

All nonstick coatings wear with use. Dishwasher use, high heat, and metal utensils accelerate peeling. Flaked coating particles may be ingested; while not acutely toxic, chronic ingestion of unknown polymers is poorly studied in humans.

20/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Composition unknown. PFAS are common in Teflon-type coating-based coatings; KitchenAid's silence on this issue is the primary concern. See PFAS grade (15/100) for full analysis.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Aluminum leaching

The aluminum core is bonded between stainless steel and the nonstick layer, so direct contact with food is prevented. Leaching is not a documented concern for tri-ply construction if the outer coating remains intact.

95/ 100
🧠

Lead

Stainless steel and modern nonstick coatings do not intentionally contain lead or cadmium. No recalls or testing data suggest contamination in this product line; standard cookware safety applies.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

KitchenAid (owned by Whirlpool Corporation) does not publicly disclose PFAS use, coating chemistry, or testing data for this product line. The brand has not published statements committing to PFAS-free formulations or third-party certifications (such as GreenGuard or NSF). No recalls or safety controversies specific to this skillet model are on record in FDA or CPSC databases, but silence on coating composition limits independent verification of safety claims.

How it compares in its category

KitchenAid's tri-ply construction is mid-to-premium in the stainless steel nonstick segment. Competitors like All-Clad, Calphalon, and Le Creuset vary widely in coating transparency, some disclose Teflon-type coating-free status (e.g., Caraway, Our Place), while most mass-market brands (including KitchenAid, Calphalon, T-fal) remain silent. The tri-ply design itself is durable and heat-distributing; the coating uncertainty is the differentiator.

If you buy it

Never heat an empty pan or exceed medium-high heat, as nonstick coatings can degrade and emit fumes above 400-500°F (exact threshold depends on undisclosed coating type). Hand wash only; dishwasher use and metal utensils accelerate coating wear. Inspect the cooking surface regularly for peeling, discoloration, or flaking; discard the pan if damage appears. Replace within 3-5 years or sooner if coating visibly degrades, especially if the composition remains unknown and you want to minimize exposure.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Kitchenaid has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Cookware

Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan

Made In

Stainless Clad Fry Pan

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Clad separation or delamination over time
MADE IN 10' Stainless Clad Frying Pan

Made In

10' Stainless Clad Frying Pan

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Nickel leaching from stainless steel

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Heritage Steel Eater Fry Pan

Heritage Steel

Eater Fry Pan

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Clad stainless steel, no coating
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Metal ion release during cooking (iron, nickel, chromium)

More cookware grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.