PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Lip Smacker Flip Gloss - Cherry Zinger

Lip Smacker · Lip Balm & Long-Wear Lipstick

Lip Smacker Flip Gloss - Cherry Zinger

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern typical of conventional lip gloss without waterproofing claims.

Verdict · BuyLip Smacker Cherry Zinger is a conventional wax-oil lip gloss with no established safety alerts; lower PFAS risk and standard cosmetic hazard profile support routine use.

This basic wax-and-oil lip gloss lacks waterproofing, nonstick, or stain-resistant features that would typically require PFAS. Lip Smacker makes no PFAS claims or disclosures.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Wax, oils, pigments in standard lip balm base

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Lip Smacker Flip Gloss - Cherry Zinger is made of, ingredients and materials

Lip Smacker Flip Gloss uses a standard lip balm base of waxes (likely beeswax or paraffin), oils, and colorants typical of mass-market glosses. The 0.11 oz size is a small, single-use applicator product designed for topical lip application only. This formulation class does not involve water-resistant coatings, nonstick surfaces, or sustained-heat processing that would introduce elevated chemical risks. The wax-and-oil base is inherently occlusive and low-migration, meaning ingredients are unlikely to leach into oral mucosa at significant levels.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Cherry Zinger variant contains fragrance or flavoring compounds to deliver scent and taste; undisclosed fragrance mixtures may trigger sensitization in individuals with known cosmetic allergies, particularly if applied repeatedly or to sensitive lip skin.

70/ 100
⏳

Product degradation and microbial colonization

Wax-based lip balms can separate, discolor, or support surface mold if stored in humid environments or past shelf life; no preservative system is typically disclosed for Lip Smacker, so prolonged storage may increase risk of degradation and should trigger replacement.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Lip Smacker does not disclose pigment sourcing or heavy metal testing; however, no recalls or safety alerts exist for this product, and lip gloss is a brief-contact, non-ingested cosmetic, limiting systemic exposure risk even if trace metals were present.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Standard wax-oil lip gloss formulations do not typically contain microplastics; no evidence of plastic particle inclusion in Lip Smacker products has been reported or recalled.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Talc contamination

Lip gloss is not a talc-based powder product and does not normally include talc as a functional ingredient; this hazard does not apply to this product category.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Lip Smacker (owned by Markwins International) is a mainstream cosmetics brand with decades of market presence and no documented recalls or safety controversies on record for this product line. The brand does not publish detailed ingredient safety statements or third-party certifications for heavy metals or contaminants; disclosure practices are typical for mass-market lip care, not above or below industry norm. No evidence of formaldehyde releasers, talc contamination, or antimony dyes has been reported in Lip Smacker products.

How it compares in its category

Lip Smacker sits in the affordable, conventional segment of lip gloss alongside brands like Burt's Bees and Maybelline; it lacks premium certifications (organic, clean beauty, third-party tested) but also carries no known quality or safety disadvantage relative to peers in the same price tier. The flip-stick format (compact applicator tube) is standard across the category and does not introduce additional hazards. Compared to luxury or indie brands, it offers less transparency but also less experimental formulation; safety profile is predictable and established.

If you buy it

Store the product at room temperature away from direct sunlight or heat to prevent wax softening or separation. Do not ingest or apply to broken skin. Replace every 1-2 years or sooner if color changes, separation occurs, or the product develops odor, as lip balms can degrade or support microbial growth over time. Use only as intended, light topical application to lips; avoid eye contact and do not share applicators between users.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Lip Smacker has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More lip balm & long-wear lipstick grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.