PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall71/ 100Good
Lip Smacker O&B Flip Gloss & Jewel Lip Balm Duo

Lip Smacker · Lip Balm & Long-Wear Lipstick

Lip Smacker O&B Flip Gloss & Jewel Lip Balm Duo

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern for standard lip balm formula.

Verdict · BuyStandard lip balm formulation with no established safety red flags; lower PFAS concern supports routine use.

This gloss and balm duo uses standard wax and emollients that rarely require PFAS treatment. Lip Smacker makes no PFAS disclosure but the product lacks typical PFAS drivers.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Wax, oils, emollients (standard lip balm base)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Lip Smacker O&B Flip Gloss & Jewel Lip is made of, ingredients and materials

Lip Smacker formulations are wax-and-oil based emollients typical of the category, relying on natural or synthetic waxes (often beeswax or paraffin) combined with petrolatum, plant oils, and fragrance. This base chemistry is inherently low-risk because lip balms are non-occlusive, leave-on products applied to mucous membrane skin where absorption is minimal and turnover rapid. The 'jewel' and 'flip gloss' descriptor indicates decorative mica or iron oxides for shimmer and color, both approved cosmetic pigments with established safety records in topical use.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Lip Smacker formulations contain proprietary fragrance blends that are not individually disclosed. Contact dermatitis or allergic reactions to fragrance components are individually variable and documented in lip balm users, particularly those with sensitive skin or history of cosmetic sensitivity.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Synthetic colorants (mica, iron oxides)

Mica and iron oxide pigments used for shimmer and color are approved cosmetic colorants with no documented safety concerns in lip balm formulations at typical use levels. Stability and purity depend on supplier quality, but no recalls or contamination events are on record for Lip Smacker products in this category.

95/ 100
✅

Petrolatum purity and refining contaminants

Petrolatum (mineral oil jelly) is a standard, highly refined lip balm base ingredient with a long safety history. Modern cosmetic-grade petrolatum is extensively purified; contamination with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is extremely rare in brand-name products meeting US cosmetic standards.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Lip balms have low water content, which reduces preservative need. No evidence suggests Lip Smacker uses formaldehyde releasers; the wax-oil base is inherently antimicrobial and self-preserving.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

FDA-approved colorants (FD&C and D&C lines) used in cosmetics are tested for lead and cadmium at manufacturing. No testing data is published for this specific product, but no regulatory findings or recalls implicate Lip Smacker formulations in heavy metal contamination.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Lip Smacker is owned by Markwins International, a mass-market cosmetics manufacturer with no major safety recalls or regulatory actions on record for this product line. The brand does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing or safety testing transparency beyond regulatory compliance; this is typical for mass-market lip balms and reflects a silent rather than proactive stance on chemical safety. No formal certifications (cruelty-free, organic, etc.) are routinely claimed for this product.

How it compares in its category

Lip Smacker occupies the mainstream budget segment alongside brands like Chapstick and Burt's Bees. It contains fewer natural-origin claims than premium alternatives, relying on synthetic waxes and fragrance rather than cold-pressed oils, but this does not translate to higher hazard risk; synthetic waxes are chemically inert once cured. The dual-package format and decorative finishes are marketing features with no safety downside compared to single-product offerings.

If you buy it

Lip balm is a low-risk product category with minimal systemic exposure; replace if the product becomes sticky, separates, or develops visible discoloration or rancid odor (sign of lipid oxidation). Store at room temperature away from direct heat to prevent melting and reformulation. Discontinue if you develop localized lip irritation or contact dermatitis, which may indicate fragrance sensitivity rather than a manufacturing defect.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Lip Smacker has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More lip balm & long-wear lipstick grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.