PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall4/ 100Bad
MAC Colour Excess Gel Pencil Eye Liner

MAC · Eyeliner

MAC Colour Excess Gel Pencil Eye Liner

Poor

Waterproof cosmetics carry PFAS risk. Skip until MAC reveals formula details.

Verdict · SkipWaterproof gel eyeliner carries PFAS risk; MAC silent on formula. Other hazard data sparse. Buy only if willing to accept unknown waterproofing chemistry and need waterproof wear.

The waterproof formula suggests fluorochemical water repellency, a historical PFAS marker. MAC offers no public PFAS statement or ingredient disclosure.

The better-graded swap

Ere Perez

Jojoba Eye Pencil

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

gel pencil with waterproof formula

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What MAC Colour Excess Gel Pencil Eye Liner is made of, ingredients and materials

MAC Colour Excess Gel Pencil is a pigmented gel-based eyeliner in pencil form, marketed as waterproof. Waterproofing in cosmetics typically relies on silicones, polymers, and waxes to repel water; many waterproof formulas historically incorporated PFAS (fluorinated compounds) to achieve water and oil resistance. The specific polymer or silicone backbone in this product is not disclosed by MAC in available public materials, making it impossible to rule out legacy PFAS use or fluorinated alternatives.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

MAC Colour Excess is marketed without explicit fragrance, but gel formulas may contain low levels of fragrance or masking agents not itemized on the label. Individuals with sensitive skin or fragrance sensitivity should patch-test before use around the eye area.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in pencil packaging

Gel eyeliner pencils are sharpened or twisted, exposing fresh product surface repeatedly. If the pencil is stored in humid conditions or the cap is left off, the open gel surface is vulnerable to contamination; higher risk than liquid formulas in sealed bottles.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof cosmetics, especially pencil eyeliners, have a documented history of PFAS use to achieve durability. MAC's silence on the waterproofing polymer chemistry and absence of a published PFAS-free claim suggest unverified or legacy formulation. See PFAS verdict above.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No published recalls or test data for MAC Colour Excess specifically. Eyeliners use FDA-approved colorants, but imported pigments in cosmetics can occasionally carry trace lead or cadmium; MAC does not publish heavy metal testing data for individual products.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Gel-based eyeliners do not typically require formaldehyde as a preservative; no evidence of this hazard in gel pencil eyeliners as a category, and no recalls involving MAC eyeliners on this front.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

MAC (Estee Lauder subsidiary) does not publicly disclose ingredient-level transparency for waterproofing agents in its waterproof cosmetics lines. The brand has not published statements on PFAS phase-out or alternatives. No major recalls or safety controversies specific to this eyeliner product are on public record. MAC does list ingredients on product labels, but waterproofing agents may be grouped under vague terms like 'polymer blend' or proprietary language, limiting consumer verification.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof gel eyeliners across brands face the same PFAS disclosure gap; MAC is not uniquely problematic in this regard. Non-waterproof gel and pencil eyeliners from the same brand or competitors avoid the waterproofing chemistry question entirely. Brands like Beautycounter and some indie/indie-adjacent lines have published PFAS-free certifications for eyeliners, though they typically sacrifice waterproof performance or durability.

If you buy it

Apply only to eyelid skin; avoid contact with eye mucosa (as with all eyeliners). Do not use if the pencil tip shows visible degradation, mold, or dried-out texture, as gel formulas can harbor bacteria once the seal is broken. Replace every 3 months or sooner if used daily. If waterproofing is not essential for your use case (e.g., everyday wear without swimming or sweating), consider a non-waterproof alternative to sidestep the PFAS uncertainty.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
MAC has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to MAC Colour Excess Gel Pencil Eye Liner?

Ere Perez

Jojoba Eye Pencil

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Jojoba oil, wax, pigments
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Ere Perez Jojoba Eye Pencil Gem (lilac haze)

Ere Perez

Jojoba Eye Pencil Gem (lilac haze)

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Jojoba oil, waxes, pigments (typical pencil formulation)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

ERE PEREZ JOJOBA EYE PENCIL Natural Black

Ere Perez

JOJOBA EYE PENCIL Natural Black

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Jojoba oil, waxes, pigments (natural eye pencil formulation)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens or essential oil irritants

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More eyeliner grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.