PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall14/ 100Bad

Too Faced · Eyeliner

Better Than Sex Waterproof Liquid Eyeliner

Poor

Waterproof cosmetics carry PFAS risk; brand discloses nothing.

Verdict · SkipWaterproof liquid eyeliner with undisclosed PFAS risk; formulation hazards typical for category but brand lacks transparency on ingredients and waterproofing chemistry.

Waterproof liquid eyeliner typically uses fluorinated compounds for water resistance. Too Faced provides no PFAS disclosure or testing data.

The better-graded swap

Ere Perez

Jojoba Eye Pencil

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Liquid eyeliner, waterproof coating unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Better Than Sex Waterproof Liquid Eyeliner is made of, ingredients and materials

Too Faced Better Than Sex is a liquid eyeliner with waterproof properties, but the specific waterproofing agent (polymer, silicone, or fluorinated compound) is not disclosed on available product information. Waterproof cosmetics typically rely on film-forming polymers or water-repellent additives; the coating mechanism here remains unspecified. Liquid eyeliners in this category commonly contain preservatives, dyes, and solvents that carry potential contact irritation or sensitization risk, especially around the sensitive eye area. Without full ingredient disclosure beyond marketing claims, the actual chemical composition cannot be fully assessed.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

Waterproof cosmetics commonly contain PFAS or other fluorinated polymers. Too Faced does not disclose the specific waterproofing chemistry, and independent testing of this product for PFAS is not available in public databases.

Source, ATSDR ↗
45/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and preservative sensitizers

Liquid eyeliners typically contain preservatives and fragrance compounds. Eye-area application increases risk of contact dermatitis or sensitization; no fragrance disclosure or allergen statement is prominently featured on available product information.

70/ 100
⚠️

Solvent exposure (volatile organic compounds)

Liquid eyeliner formulas rely on organic solvents to maintain flow. Inhalation of solvent vapors during application is possible, particularly in poorly ventilated spaces; solvent type and concentration are not publicly disclosed.

70/ 100
🎨

Eye irritation from colorant pigments or additives

Iron oxides and synthetic dyes are common in eyeliners. While generally recognized as low concern in cosmetics, migration into the eye or sensitivity to specific dyes carries risk, especially with repeated, prolonged application near the eyelid margin.

70/ 100
⚠️

Microbial contamination if improperly maintained

Liquid eyeliners are not sterile products and rely on formula preservatives to prevent bacterial or fungal growth. Exposure to moisture, non-sterile applicators, or age-related preservative breakdown increases contamination risk, particularly when applied near the waterline.

70/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Too Faced does not publicly disclose PFAS avoidance or testing statements, and the brand has not made transparency commitments regarding waterproofing chemistry or ingredient sourcing that are visible in major product databases or corporate statements. The brand's parent company (Estée Lauder) has broader sustainability commitments but does not specifically address PFAS or fluorinated compounds in eyeliner formulations. Product labeling typically lists only a subset of ingredients; full formulation data is not readily available to consumers. No significant safety recalls specific to this product are on public record, but absence of reported issues does not confirm absence of potential hazards.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof liquid eyeliners across all brands carry similar PFAS concern because waterproofing coatings often rely on fluorinated chemistry. Too Faced does not differentiate itself through ingredient transparency or third-party verification (e.g., EWG certification, MADE SAFE, or dermatologist testing disclosures are not prominently marketed). Competitors in the premium eyeliner segment (e.g., Urban Decay, Benefit, MAC) similarly do not disclose waterproofing agents on consumer-facing materials. In this category, product differentiation is usually based on color range and formula longevity rather than chemical safety profile.

If you buy it

Apply only to the eyelid area and avoid contact with eyes; waterproof formulas are harder to remove and may require oil-based cleansing. Replace every 3-6 months or when the formula thickens or separates, as liquid eyeliners do not contain strong preservatives and are prone to contamination once opened. If you experience persistent redness, itching, or irritation around the eye, discontinue use immediately and rinse thoroughly with water. Store the cap tightly closed and do not expose to heat or direct sunlight, as solvents can evaporate and concentrate remaining chemicals.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Too Faced has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Better Than Sex Waterproof Liquid Eyeliner?

Ere Perez

Jojoba Eye Pencil

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Jojoba oil, wax, pigments
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Ere Perez Jojoba Eye Pencil Gem (lilac haze)

Ere Perez

Jojoba Eye Pencil Gem (lilac haze)

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Jojoba oil, waxes, pigments (typical pencil formulation)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

ERE PEREZ JOJOBA EYE PENCIL Natural Black

Ere Perez

JOJOBA EYE PENCIL Natural Black

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Jojoba oil, waxes, pigments (natural eye pencil formulation)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens or essential oil irritants

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More eyeliner grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.