PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall47/ 100Poor
MAC Studio Fix Fluid SPF 15 24HR Matte Foundation Oil Control

MAC · Makeup

MAC Studio Fix Fluid SPF 15 24HR Matte Foundation Oil Control

Good

Cosmetic PFAS risk is low for use-and-rinse products, but MAC makes no public disclosure.

Verdict: SkipLiquid foundation with low documented hazard profile; silicone-based formula reduces heavy metal leaching risk. MAC discloses some ingredients but remains silent on PFAS.

This rinse-off liquid foundation has no known Teflon-family coating or water-resistant coatings typical of PFAS products. MAC makes no public PFAS disclosures.

The safe swap

Rimmel London Lasting Finish Foundation

Rimmel

Rimmel London Lasting Finish Foundation

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

liquid foundation with silicones, pigments, and emollients

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

Iron oxide colorants used in foundations can contain trace lead or cadmium depending on ore sourcing and refining. No recall or test result on record for this MAC formula, but the risk exists across the category; silicone encapsulation may reduce dermal absorption.

Source: FDA
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

MAC Studio Fix lists 'fragrance' as an ingredient. Fragrance blends commonly contain limonene, linalool, and geraniol, which are established contact allergens in some populations. Users with fragrance sensitivity or atopic dermatitis may experience irritation.

45/ 100
⚠️

Skin barrier disruption from silicone occlusion

High silicone content may trap moisture and create anaerobic microenvironment on prolonged wear, potentially worsening acne or fungal colonization in predisposed individuals. This is use-dependent rather than a direct chemical toxicity, but relevant for sensitive or compromised skin.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No documented use of formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin) is apparent from available ingredient disclosures for this product. Modern Estee Lauder formulations typically use safer preservative systems, but full preservative identity is not always published.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Talc contamination

Studio Fix Fluid is a liquid formula and does not contain talc as a core ingredient. Talc-free formulation eliminates asbestos and respirable dust risks associated with powder products.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Studio Fix Fluid is a silicone-based liquid foundation containing dimethicone and cyclopentasiloxane as primary film-formers, plus iron oxides and titanium dioxide for pigmentation. The silicone matrix reduces direct skin contact with pigment particles and limits leaching of heavy metals from colorants. Oil-control claim suggests polymers that absorb sebum; these are typically silica derivatives or acrylates, which are low-toxicity at dermal concentrations.

The brand's record and disclosure

MAC (Estee Lauder subsidiary) publishes ingredient lists and complies with FDA cosmetic regulations and EU Cosmetics Regulation labeling. The brand has no established recalls for heavy metal contamination or formaldehyde releasers in recent years. MAC does not publicly disclose PFAS content or manufacturing restrictions on fluorinated compounds, consistent with most major beauty brands that treat this as proprietary.

How it compares in its category

Silicone-based foundations are among the safer delivery systems for pigments because the occlusive polymer coating reduces bioavailability of trace contaminants. Water-based or oil-based alternatives may expose skin more directly to heavy metals in iron oxide pigments. MAC's long market presence and parent company oversight place it above unregulated indie brands, though third-party heavy metal testing data for this specific formula is not publicly available.

If you buy it

Apply with clean brush or sponge to minimize bacterial growth on applicator between uses. Do not heat the product or store above 25 degrees Celsius, as silicone polymers remain stable across typical use conditions but thermal stress can accelerate emulsion breakdown. Replace after 12 months of opening to reduce risk of water-phase microbial colonization. Patch test on inner arm if you have sensitive skin or known fragrance allergens; the formula contains fragrance compounds that are potential skin sensitizers.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 55% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
MAC has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Makeup

Clinique Even Better Makeup

Clinique

Even Better Makeup

Pigments, oils, waxes, polymers (typical liquid foundation/makeup base)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade43Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Applicator sponge bacterial growth

High concern

20

No known PFAS risk, but Clinique offers no public PFAS disclosure.

Risky category by default

Clinique Even Better Clinical Serum Foundation Broad Spectrum SPF 25

Clinique

Even Better Clinical Serum Foundation Broad Spectrum SPF 25

liquid foundation with pigments, emollients, silicones

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade63Good
🎨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergen sensitization

Limited concern

70
⚠️

1,4-dioxane contamination in emulsifiers

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Liquid cosmetics rarely contain intentional PFAS.

Risky category by default

Clinique Superbalanced Makeup

Clinique

Superbalanced Makeup

Talc, mineral pigments, silicone

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade61Good
🪨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
💨

Inhalation risk from powder dust

Moderate concern

45

Lower concern. Typical mineral-based makeup with no known PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

More makeup grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.