PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Mauviel M'cook B Frying Pan With Brass Handle

Mauviel · Cookware

Mauviel M'cook B Frying Pan With Brass Handle

Bad

Coating identity unclear, brand offers no PFAS statement.

Verdict: SkipStainless steel body is safe; non-stick coating origin unclear and brand silent on PFAS. Requires careful use and monitoring.

Mauviel won't disclose the non-stick coating formula or address PFAS concerns. No third-party testing exists for this pan.

The safe swap

Le Creuset Enameled Cast Iron

Le Creuset

Le Creuset Enameled Cast Iron

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Stainless steel body with non-stick coating, brass handle

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (inhalation hazard)

If the non-stick coating is Teflon-type coating-based, heating above 500F can release polymer fumes causing flu-like symptoms. Mauviel's silence makes the heating threshold unknown for this specific product; safest assumption is lower tolerance than stated, especially if coating quality control is unclear.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

Non-stick pans of unknown composition are more prone to accelerated wear from thermal cycling and mechanical stress. Scratches or peeling expose the underlying stainless steel substrate, but micro-particles of the detached polymer coating may be ingested before visible damage occurs.

45/ 100
⛏️

Brass handle leaching and corrosion

Brass is an alloy of copper and zinc; direct food contact with corroded or unfinished brass can leach trace copper and zinc. If the handle is not properly sealed or lacquered, prolonged moisture or acidic food residue (oils, vinegar) may accelerate corrosion and transfer to hands or food during cooking.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Aluminum leaching

No aluminum core is documented in the M'cook B; stainless steel construction minimizes this risk. Not a concern for this product.

95/ 100
🧠

Lead

Stainless steel with non-stick polymer coating does not rely on ceramic glazes or enamels. No historical recalls or contamination reports for Mauviel cookware on this hazard are documented.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Mauviel M'cook B features a stainless steel cooking surface bonded to a non-stick coating, with a brass handle. Stainless steel itself is chemically inert and food-safe. The critical unknown is the non-stick layer: Mauviel does not publicly disclose whether it uses Teflon-type coating (traditional Teflon), ceramic, or another polymer system. This opacity is the primary safety concern, as the coating's composition determines heating stability and potential fume release.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mauviel is a respected French cookware manufacturer established in 1830, known for professional-grade products. However, the company makes no public statement about PFAS avoidance or non-stick coating materials on this product line. Industry pressure on PFAS transparency has not prompted Mauviel to publish ingredient lists or certifications for their non-stick coatings. This silence is notable given competitors increasingly market PFOA-free or ceramic alternatives.

How it compares in its category

Premium stainless steel non-stick pans typically fall into two camps: Teflon-type coating-based (highly durable, uncertain PFAS status) and ceramic or inorganic coatings (marketed as PFAS-free but often less durable). The M'cook B's lack of transparency places it in a middle position where safer alternatives exist with full disclosure. Comparable mid-range options from brands like Caraway or Our Place explicitly market PFAS-free coatings, while professional Teflon-type coating pans (All-Clad, Calphalon) openly acknowledge their use.

If you buy it

Never exceed medium-high heat (under 400F / 200C), as unknown non-stick polymers may degrade or off-gas at higher temperatures. Hand wash only; dishwashers accelerate coating breakdown. Inspect the non-stick surface monthly for peeling, cloudiness, or damage; discard the pan if the coating flakes. Store without stacking to prevent scratching. Given the coating mystery, this pan suits low-heat cooking (sauces, omelets, pancakes) rather than searing or high-temperature use.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Mauviel has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.