PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall59/ 100Good

Medix · Body Wash

Amazon.com: Medix 5.5: Cleansers

Excellent

Insufficient detail on ingredients. Standard cleanser with low inherent PFAS risk.

Verdict · Buy with careWater-based cleanser with low PFAS risk but opaque ingredient list limits assessment of preservatives, fragrance allergens, and formaldehyde-releaser risk.

Medix 5.5 is a facial cleanser with no public PFAS claims or third-party verification. Standard cosmetic cleansers rarely contain PFAS, but full ingredient transparency is unavailable.

Find it on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

water-based cleansing solution, formulation unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Amazon.com: Medix 5.5: Cleansers is made of, ingredients and materials

Medix 5.5 is described as a water-based cleansing solution, but the brand does not publicly disclose its full ingredient list on Amazon or its website. Water-based formulations typically contain surfactants, humectants, and preservatives, none of which are inherently hazardous at regulatory levels. However, without transparency on specific actives and preservatives used, common concern areas in cleansers, such as formaldehyde-releasing preservatives or undisclosed fragrance components, cannot be ruled in or out.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Medix does not disclose preservative identity. Common preservatives in water-based cleansers (e.g., imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin) release small amounts of formaldehyde. Regulatory limits in the US allow this, but sensitive individuals may react.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Product labeling does not specify fragrance ingredients. US law permits 'fragrance' as a catch-all term without itemizing hundreds of volatile compounds, some of which (e.g., limonene, linalool, citral) are known contact allergens.

70/ 100
🏭

1,4-dioxane (manufacturing impurity)

Water-based cleansers formulated with certain ethoxylated surfactants may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct. Medix does not claim to test for or exclude this impurity. Levels in rinse-off products are typically low-risk, but cumulative exposure from multiple products remains a consideration.

70/ 100
🏷️

Skin irritation from undisclosed actives

Without a published ingredient list, potential pH level, active concentration, or exfoliating agents cannot be verified. The product line name '5.5' may refer to pH, suggesting formulation for sensitive skin, but this is inference only.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No record of colorant or pigment use in this water-based cleanser line. Rinse-off cosmetics carry lower heavy metal risk than leave-on products, and no contamination reports exist for this brand.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Medix has no published record of third-party certification (e.g., EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny, or dermatological testing claims) readily available. The brand maintains a silent stance on PFAS, which is typical for smaller cleansing product manufacturers but reflects no proactive commitment to ingredient transparency. No significant product recalls or safety controversies are on record for this line.

How it compares in its category

Mass-market water-based cleansers vary widely in disclosure depth. Medix 5.5 sits in the mid-transparency tier, it avoids marketing as hypoallergenic or clinically tested, which reduces greenwashing but also means no third-party substantiation. Comparable products from larger brands (e.g., CeraVe, Cetaphil) typically publish full ingredient lists and dermatologist testing claims; Medix does not, making direct safety comparison difficult.

If you buy it

Perform a patch test on inner arm 24 hours before full facial use, especially if you have sensitive or reactive skin. Store in a cool, dry place and discard if discoloration, odor, or separation occurs. If irritation, rash, or burning develops, discontinue and consult a dermatologist. Contact the manufacturer for a complete ingredient list if you have fragrance sensitivities or allergies to common preservatives.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Medix has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More body wash grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.