PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Milton Fry Pan Honeycomb

Milton · Cookware

Milton Fry Pan Honeycomb

Bad

Nonstick coating unidentified. No PFAS disclosure available.

Verdict: SkipUnspecified nonstick coating raises PFAS uncertainty; no major non-PFAS hazards documented, but limited brand transparency demands careful use.

Milton's honeycomb nonstick pan has no disclosed coating information or PFAS status, and the brand offers no public test results.

The safe swap

Pyrex Ceramic Cookware Set

Pyrex

Pyrex Ceramic Cookware Set

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nonstick coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume inhalation risk

If coating is Teflon-type coating-based (unconfirmed), overheating causes polymer fume fever in humans and acute toxicity in pet birds. Milton provides no heat limit guidance or material confirmation.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle release

Unspecified nonstick coatings degrade with use, dishwasher exposure, and metal utensils. Flaking particles may contaminate food; no testing or durability data from manufacturer mitigates this concern.

70/ 100
⚠️

Lack of independent verification or certification

No third-party safety testing, NSF certification, or GREENGUARD status documented. Absence of transparency is itself a hazard in the absence of competing safer alternatives with full disclosure.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Substrate metal leaching (aluminum or steel base)

If base is bare aluminum or unlined steel, acidic or salty foods can cause metal leaching. Product details do not clarify base material or barrier coating, but this is a standard risk for low-cost unspecified cookware.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Milton has not publicly disclosed the specific nonstick chemistry used on this frypan. The 'Honeycomb' branding refers to the surface texture pattern, not the coating material itself. Without manufacturer specification, it is impossible to confirm whether the coating is Teflon-type coating-based (traditional Teflon-type), ceramic, or an alternative polymer. This opacity is the primary concern, since nonstick chemistry determines both fume risk at high heat and potential coating degradation over time.

The brand's record and disclosure

Milton is an Indian kitchenware brand with limited public environmental, health, or material transparency. No certifications (e.g., GREENGUARD, NSF) are on record for this product line. Milton has not issued statements regarding PFAS use, Teflon-type coating alternatives, or coating safety standards. This silence is notable in a category where competitors increasingly provide coating composition details and third-party testing.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream nonstick frypans either declare Teflon-type coating use or market ceramic or mineral-based coatings as PFAS-free alternatives. Milton's refusal to specify puts this product behind established transparency benchmarks. Entry-level unspecified nonstick cookware from lesser-known brands is a category risk; premium and mid-tier brands (e.g., T-fal, Calphalon, GreenPan) typically publish material data sheets or third-party certifications.

If you buy it

Avoid preheating empty or heating above medium-high (around 350F / 177C) to minimize fume risk if coating is Teflon-type coating. Hand-wash only; dishwashers accelerate coating wear and may expose substrate. Replace within 2-3 years or immediately if coating visibly peels, scratches, or flakes, as degradation releases particles into food. Store carefully to prevent scratching; use wood or silicone utensils only.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Milton has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.