PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Milton Nonstick Frying Pan 8.5 Inch. Large Pan For Egg Omelette,

Milton · Cookware

Milton Nonstick Frying Pan 8.5 Inch. Large Pan For Egg Omelette,

Bad

Pass until Milton publicly identifies coating material.

Verdict: SkipMilton nonstick cookware lacks disclosed coating detail and PFAS transparency; usable with strict heat discipline and monitoring for degradation.

Milton keeps their nonstick coating formula secret and says nothing about PFAS, though standard nonstick cookware often contains Teflon-family coating.

The safe swap

GreenPan Dover 12-Piece Ceramic Nonstick Cookware Set

GreenPan

GreenPan Dover 12-Piece Ceramic Nonstick Cookware Set

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nonstick coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (if Teflon-type coating-based)

Milton does not disclose whether coating is Teflon-type coating. If it is, overheating above 500°F can release polymer fume inhalation toxins (Teflon-type coating/Teflon flu). Budget brands sometimes lack adequate thickness or thermal stability; strict heat discipline is essential.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and particle shedding

Budget nonstick coatings are prone to flaking within 2-4 years of normal use, particularly if coating thickness is minimal. Milton does not specify coating durability or thickness. Ingestion of shed nonstick particles in food is a recognized concern with lower-cost pans.

45/ 100
🔩

Aluminum leaching

If the nonstick coating is thin or degrades, underlying aluminum may contact acidic or alkaline foods. Milton does not specify coating thickness or anodization of the aluminum substrate. Acidic foods (tomatoes, vinegar, citrus) pose the highest leaching risk on worn pans.

70/ 100
💨

Off-gassing or volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during initial use

New nonstick cookware can emit odors during first heating, suggesting off-gassing of coating solvents or release agents. Milton does not provide outgassing specifications or cure instructions. First-use smell is common but should dissipate after 2-3 hand-washes and careful preheating.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No recalls or test results on record for Milton nonstick cookware containing lead or cadmium in paint or enamel. However, the lack of third-party testing by Milton makes this a data gap rather than a confirmed absence of risk.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Milton does not publicly specify whether this pan uses Teflon-type coating (Teflon-type), ceramic, or proprietary nonstick chemistry. The substrate appears to be aluminum or aluminum alloy based on typical 8.5-inch frying pan construction at this price point. Without coating material disclosure, you cannot assess whether fumes risk exists under high heat or whether the coating will leach or degrade predictably over time.

The brand's record and disclosure

Milton is a budget kitchenware brand with minimal public safety documentation or third-party testing records. The company does not appear to have published material safety data sheets or coating composition statements for this product. No major recalls are on record for this specific pan, but the lack of transparency on nonstick chemistry is a significant disclosure gap compared to established brands like T-fal or OXO.

How it compares in its category

Budget nonstick pans in this size typically use either legacy Teflon-type coating or unspecified polymer coatings to keep costs low. Mid-range alternatives from recognized brands usually disclose Teflon-type coating or ceramic construction and provide care guidelines tied to coating type. This Milton pan offers no such clarity, making it harder to assess longevity or safety margins versus alternatives at similar or slightly higher price points.

If you buy it

Keep heat below medium (below 350°F); never preheat empty or use on high. Inspect the coating monthly for flaking, discoloration, or bare patches; discontinue use immediately if damage appears. Hand wash only with soft sponges; avoid metal utensils and dishwashers. Replace within 3-5 years or sooner if coating shows wear, as degraded nonstick surfaces may shed particles or lose non-stick function entirely.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Milton has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.