Milton Pro Cook Non Induction Granito Fry Pan, 18 Cm Frying Pan - 330 gms
Nonstick coating unspecified. No PFAS data or testing provided.
Milton's granito nonstick pan has no public coating details or PFAS information, and the brand hasn't provided third-party testing.
The safe swap
GreenPan
GreenPan Dover 12-Piece Ceramic Nonstick Cookware Set
90/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Granito non-stick coating, unspecified composition
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed
Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.
No PFAS disclosure
The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
Non-stick coating degradation and fume risk
Milton does not disclose whether this coating is Teflon-type coating, ceramic, or another polymer. Unspecified non-stick coatings can degrade at lower temperatures if lower-quality, releasing volatile compounds or shedding particles. Risk is elevated if overheated or mechanically damaged.
Aluminum leaching
The aluminum substrate can leach aluminum into acidic foods (tomatoes, vinegar, citrus) if the non-stick coating is thin, worn, or partially absent. Milton does not specify coating thickness or longevity testing, making leaching risk unpredictable over time.
Coating adhesion and shedding
Low-cost non-stick coatings sometimes show poor adhesion to aluminum, especially under thermal stress. There is no public data on Milton Granito pans' coating durability; premature peeling or flaking is a recognized risk in this budget segment.
Lack of safety transparency
Milton has not published safety certifications (e.g., FDA compliance, LFGB, or PFAS-free claims) for this cookware. This absence is not proof of hazard but prevents informed risk assessment and suggests lower safety priority than competitors.
What’s reassuring
Lead
No evidence that Milton uses ceramic or enamel coating on this model; the Granito coating is likely polymer-based. If any ceramic component exists, Milton provides no test data ruling out heavy metal glazes, though no recalls or contamination reports exist for this product.
Source: ATSDR ↗The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Milton markets this pan with a 'Granito' non-stick coating, but the company does not publicly specify the chemical composition or whether Teflon-type coating, ceramic, or other polymer systems are used. The base appears to be stamped or cast aluminum (common for 330g cookware in this size class). Without coating transparency, you cannot assess degradation risk, fume hazard temperature thresholds, or coating longevity. Aluminum cookware can leach small amounts of aluminum into food under acidic conditions; a non-stick barrier mitigates this if intact, but integrity depends on the coating's durability.
The brand's record and disclosure
Milton (an Indian kitchenware brand) has not published detailed safety data sheets, PFAS testing results, or third-party certifications for its non-stick cookware line. The company does not appear on major transparency initiatives tracking PFAS phase-out commitments. No significant recalls or contamination incidents are recorded in public health databases for this specific model, but absence of records does not confirm safety; it may reflect limited global distribution or reporting. This silence on coating chemistry is a yellow flag in an industry where leading competitors increasingly disclose composition.
How it compares in its category
Budget-tier non-stick pans (typically under $20 USD equivalent) often use proprietary or minimally disclosed coatings to reduce cost. Milton's Granito pans sit in this segment. Premium brands (Le Creuset, GreenPan, Caraway) publish PFAS-free claims and coating specifications; traditional cast iron or stainless steel have no coating risk but require more care. Mid-range ceramic or Teflon-type coating-based alternatives from established brands (T-fal, Calphalon) offer better safety documentation. Milton's lack of disclosure is typical for regional budget brands but behind global best practice.
If you buy it
Keep heat below medium-high (do not exceed 350-375F / 175-190C) to avoid coating breakdown and potential fume release, especially if the coating is Teflon-type coating-based. Hand wash gently; avoid metal utensils and dishwasher use, which accelerate coating wear. Inspect the cooking surface monthly for chipping, peeling, or discoloration; discontinue use if coating integrity is visibly compromised, as degraded coatings can shed particles. Replace the pan every 2-3 years with regular use, sooner if coatings degrade; do not rely on longevity claims for unspecified coatings.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Milton has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Safer alternatives in Cookware
GreenPan
Ceramic Non-stick
Coating degradation and integrity loss
Limited concern
Aluminum leaching
Limited concern
Microparticle shedding from coating
Limited concern
Low risk, safe to use.
⚠Risky category by default
Scanpan
Ceramic Titanium
Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching
Limited concern
Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating
Limited concern
Low risk, safe to use.
⚠Risky category by default
GreenPan
Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set
Ceramic coating degradation over time
Limited concern
Thermal shock and handle integrity
Limited concern
Low risk, safe to use.
⚠Risky category by default
More cookware grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.