PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Milton ProCook Non-Stick Aluminium Fry Pan 24cm

Milton · Cookware

Milton ProCook Non-Stick Aluminium Fry Pan 24cm

Bad

Pass until Milton confirms coating with manufacturer.

Verdict: SkipAluminum non-stick pan with unidentified coating poses coating degradation and aluminum leaching risks; PFAS status unknown. Require manufacturer confirmation before full recommendation.

Milton won't say what nonstick coating covers their aluminum pan, and unknown coatings on cookware typically hide PFAS risk. Ask the manufacturer first.

The safe swap

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick 10-Piece Cookware Set

GreenPan

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick 10-Piece Cookware Set

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Aluminium with unspecified non-stick coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (if Teflon-type coating-based coating)

If this pan uses Teflon-type coating, overheating above 260°C can release fumes; Milton has not confirmed coating type, so risk cannot be ruled out.

70/ 100
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Uncoated or worn aluminum surfaces can leach aluminum into acidic foods (tomatoes, vinegar, citrus). Coating degradation over time increases this risk.

70/ 100

Non-stick coating degradation

Aluminum pans with non-stick coatings are prone to peeling, scratching, and loss of function within 2-5 years of use; Milton provides no public durability testing data.

20/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Graded separately; Milton's silence on PFAS status is the primary reason for the skip recommendation pending manufacturer response.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

Some ceramic non-stick coatings contain trace metals; no adverse findings reported for Milton products, but lack of disclosure prevents verification.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This pan is aluminum with an unspecified non-stick coating, likely Teflon-type coating-based (Teflon) or ceramic-hybrid, though Milton has not publicly disclosed the formulation. Aluminum cookware can leach aluminum into food under acidic or prolonged heating conditions, especially when the protective coating degrades. The non-stick coating's durability and composition directly determine long-term safety; without manufacturer specification, the risk profile cannot be fully assessed.

The brand's record and disclosure

Milton is a UK-based kitchenware brand with limited public safety disclosures. No major recalls specific to this model are on record, but the brand has not published material safety data sheets, coating composition details, or PFAS statements for this product line. This silence on non-stick coating chemistry is a significant transparency gap for a product category where coating type critically affects safety.

How it compares in its category

Aluminum non-stick pans at this price point typically use Teflon-type coating or ceramic coatings. Compared to stainless steel pans (no coating leaching risk) or cast iron (no degradation), aluminum non-stick offers convenience but introduces coating integrity as a long-term concern. Higher-end brands often certify Teflon-type coating coatings as PFOA-free and publish durability standards; Milton's lack of such detail puts this mid-range.

If you buy it

Keep heat below 260°C (500°F) to avoid coating breakdown and fume release. Hand wash only; dishwashers accelerate coating wear. Inspect the cooking surface regularly for scratches, peeling, or discoloration; discard if coating is visibly compromised. Before purchase, contact Milton directly to confirm the non-stick coating type and any PFAS or PFOA content claims.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Milton has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.