PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Mirro Fry Pan, Black, 8 Inch

Mirro · Cookware

Mirro Fry Pan, Black, 8 Inch

Bad

Avoid until Mirro reveals the nonstick coating composition.

Verdict: SkipAluminum nonstick with undisclosed coating composition poses Teflon-type coating fume and aluminum leaching risks; use cautiously with proper ventilation and avoid high heat.

Mirro doesn't disclose this pan's nonstick coating type or PFAS status. Older Mirro cookware lines show little transparency about Teflon-family coating use.

The safe swap

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

aluminum with nonstick coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (if Teflon-type coating-based)

Mirro has not disclosed the nonstick coating chemistry. If Teflon-type coating (Teflon) based, overheating above 500F can release toxic perfluorinated fumes. The 8-inch home-use size poses low risk if heating is controlled, but fume inhalation hazard exists if pan is left on high heat unattended or preheated empty.

70/ 100
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Aluminum cookware is established to release aluminum ions into food, especially acidic foods and during prolonged contact. Daily use with tomatoes, wine, or citrus can accumulate aluminum intake. This is a known hazard of aluminum cookware category, not specific to Mirro, but relevant here.

45/ 100

Nonstick coating degradation and leaching

Without disclosed coating composition, degradation byproducts cannot be identified. Scratches, peeling, or cloudiness indicate coating breakdown. Once compromised, leaching of unknown coating constituents into food is possible, compounded by the underlying aluminum.

20/ 100
💨

Off-gassing of unknown compounds during manufacturing residues

Undisclosed nonstick formulations may retain volatile manufacturing residues. New pan odor or fume during initial use is common with budget nonstick cookware. Ventilation and hand-washing before first use can reduce exposure, but the specific chemicals are unknown.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No specific recalls or test failures for Mirro black nonstick pans have been publicly reported for lead or cadmium. However, if the coating is ceramic or enamel rather than Teflon-type coating, the risk exists but is unconfirmed for this product without independent lab testing.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This Mirro fry pan is constructed from aluminum with a black nonstick coating of unspecified chemistry. Aluminum cookware can leach aluminum ions into food, particularly in acidic or prolonged-contact cooking. The nonstick coating's composition (whether Teflon-type coating, ceramic, or proprietary) is not publicly disclosed by the brand, making it impossible to fully assess fume-release risk at elevated temperatures or coating durability over time.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mirro, now owned by Groupe SEB, has not published detailed material safety data or coating composition for this product line. The brand maintains no public stance on PFAS avoidance or alternatives disclosure. No major recalls specifically linked to this model appear in FDA or CPSC records, but the lack of transparency on nonstick chemistry reflects a broader industry pattern of withholding formulation details from consumers.

How it compares in its category

Budget aluminum nonstick pans like this Mirro occupy the lower end of cookware safety disclosure. Comparable alternatives (T-fal, Calphalon budget lines) similarly omit coating specifics. Higher-tier brands and ceramic or stainless-steel options typically publish more detailed composition information and often carry third-party certifications. This product's lack of transparency is standard for its price tier, not exceptional.

If you buy it

Keep heat below medium-high (no preheating empty) to avoid coating breakdown and potential fume release. Avoid acidic foods (tomato, citrus, vinegar) left sitting in the pan, as aluminum leaching accelerates under these conditions. Hand wash only, do not use metal utensils. Inspect the coating regularly for chips, scratches, or peeling; discard if damage is visible, as degraded coating increases both aluminum and unknown nonstick compound leaching.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Mirro has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.