PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Mirro Get A Grip Saute Pan

Mirro · Cookware

Mirro Get A Grip Saute Pan

Bad

Avoid until Mirro clarifies the nonstick coating type.

Verdict: SkipAluminum saute pan with mystery nonstick coating and silent PFAS stance; usable if kept below medium-high heat and replaced every 3-5 years.

Mirro provides no details about this saute pan's nonstick coating type or PFAS content. Most nonstick cookware contains PFAS, so undisclosed coatings raise red flags.

The safe swap

Pyrex Ceramic Cookware Set

Pyrex

Pyrex Ceramic Cookware Set

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

aluminum saute pan with unspecified nonstick coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Aluminum itself can leach into acidic or alkaline foods if the nonstick barrier is breached or worn. No direct evidence of dangerous levels in this model, but degradation over time increases risk, especially if coating is thin or poor-quality.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (if Teflon-type coating-based coating)

Mirro does not confirm coating type; if Teflon-type coating, overheating above 500°F can release fumes toxic to birds and harmful to humans at high exposures. Unknown coating identity makes this impossible to rule out.

70/ 100
🍂

Coating degradation and microflaking

Aluminum nonstick pans of this price tier typically show visible wear and peeling within 2-3 years. Ingestion of flaked coating particles is a reported concern; no toxicity standard exists for small amounts, but loss of nonstick function signals safety boundary.

20/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

Brand silence on whether coating is Teflon-type coating, GenX, or alternative means consumer cannot assess PFAS load independently. This absence of transparency is itself a documented industry pattern linked to regulatory gaps and potential use of legacy or unvetted chemistries.

Source: ATSDR
45/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No specific testing or recalls for this product exist. Mirro does not disclose heavy metal assays for coating materials, so baseline risk cannot be ruled out, though modern US manufacturing is unlikely to use lead-based glazes.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Mirro Get A Grip is an aluminum saute pan with an applied nonstick coating of unspecified composition. Aluminum itself is a weak conductor of heat and prone to leaching in acidic or high-pH foods, though the nonstick layer should act as a barrier if intact. The critical unknown is the coating type: if it is Teflon-type coating-based (Teflon), it poses fume risk above 500°F; if ceramic or alternative, the risk profile differs substantially. Mirro has not publicly disclosed coating chemistry, making hazard assessment incomplete.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mirro (owned by Groupe SEB, a major French cookware manufacturer) has no established public commitment to PFAS elimination or transparency about nonstick composition in consumer-facing materials. The company does not advertise third-party testing or certifications (such as FDA compliance beyond baseline, or GOTS/Oeko-Tex equivalents for cookware). No major recalls or controversies specific to this model are on record, but the silence on coating chemistry is a red flag for a modern consumer product and suggests either older formulation practices or reluctance to disclose.

How it compares in its category

Mid-range aluminum nonstick saute pans are common and affordable, but quality and transparency vary widely. Competitors like T-fal and Calphalon (also Groupe SEB brands) similarly withhold detailed coating disclosure, whereas premium brands like Le Creuset and mid-tier alternatives like Caraway or GreenPan explicitly market PFOA-free or ceramic coatings. The Mirro offers no durability advantage or safety differentiation; it is a budget option that trades transparency for cost, making it riskier for long-term health-conscious use than fully disclosed alternatives.

If you buy it

Keep the pan below medium-high heat (under 400°F for safety margin), avoid preheating empty, and never exceed stovetop temperatures that cause visible smoking. Hand wash rather than dishwash to preserve coating integrity; expect visible wear within 2-3 years of regular use, at which point coating flaking or loss of nonstick function becomes likely. Replace the pan at the first sign of discoloration, sticking, or visible peeling. Avoid acidic foods (tomatoes, vinegar, citrus) or use them briefly, as aluminum can leach into food if the coating is compromised.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Mirro has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.