Neutrogena Healthy Skin Anti-Aging Perfector SPF 20
Insufficient data; no public PFAS disclosure or testing available.
Neutrogena does not publicly disclose PFAS presence or absence in this sunscreen product. No third-party certifications or manufacturer testing available.
The better-graded swap
MAC
MAC Studio Fix Powder Plus Foundation
75/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Water-based emulsion cosmetic formula
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Neutrogena Healthy Skin Perfector SPF is made of, ingredients and materials
Neutrogena Healthy Skin Anti-Aging Perfector is a water-based emulsion cosmetic, not a powder or oil-based suspension. Water-based formulas typically carry lower risk for talc contamination and reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing compared to solvent-heavy alternatives. The SPF 20 indicates inclusion of UV-blocking actives (likely titanium dioxide or zinc oxide), which are inert mineral or synthetic filters. No known hazardous coatings, resins, or flame retardants are present in the formula category.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
1,4-dioxane (cosmetic contaminant)
Water-based emulsions may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of ethoxylation in surfactants or emulsifiers; no testing data available for this specific product, but not uncommon in the category at low ppb levels.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Neutrogena formulations may use formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., imidazolidinyl urea) to prevent bacterial growth in water-based systems; no specific ingredient declaration available in public sources to confirm or exclude this.
Source, ATSDR ↗Fragrance allergens
Product contains fragrance or fragrance components; no detailed allergen disclosure available. Individuals with sensitive skin or known fragrance sensitivities should perform patch testing or choose fragrance-free alternatives.
What’s reassuring
Heavy metals
No established reports of heavy metal contamination (lead, cadmium, arsenic) in Neutrogena Anti-Aging Perfector; cosmetic colorants are regulated under FDA guidelines, and mineral UV filters (titanium dioxide, zinc oxide) are not known sources of heavy metals in this product.
Source, FDA ↗Talc contamination
Water-based emulsion formulas do not typically incorporate talc as a texture agent; no talc-related concern applies to this product category or brand line.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Neutrogena is owned by Johnson & Johnson and operates under established cosmetic safety standards in North America and EU. The brand maintains no public stance on PFAS disclosure and has not published testing results for per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances in this product. No established recalls or safety controversies specific to this product line are on record. Compliance with FDA cosmetic ingredient regulations and listing requirements is standard but does not guarantee PFAS absence.
How it compares in its category
Anti-aging perfectors in this price tier typically use water-based emulsions with similar ingredient profiles. Competing products (Olay, Cetaphil) rarely disclose PFAS testing either, making this product representative of market norms rather than an outlier. Mineral sunscreen options (titanium dioxide/zinc oxide) present in this product are considered lower-concern alternatives to chemical UV absorbers. No particular advantage or disadvantage versus category peers on non-PFAS hazards.
If you buy it
Apply as directed on clean skin; water-based formulas do not require special storage beyond room temperature and normal light protection. Do not exceed recommended application frequency; no special maintenance or replacement trigger beyond product expiration date applies. If irritation or unusual reaction occurs, discontinue use and consult a dermatologist. Store away from extreme heat and direct sunlight to preserve emulsion stability.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Neutrogena has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Neutrogena Healthy Skin Anti-Aging Perfector SPF 20?
- water, hyaluronic acid, glycerin, pigments, emollients
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- 1,4-dioxane contamination from emulsifiers
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- pigments, oils, waxes, polymers (standard cosmetic formulations)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Fragrance allergens or 1,4-dioxane in fragrances
- pigments, waxes, oils, talc, mica
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Fragrance allergens
More makeup grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.