PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall49/ 100Poor
Neutrogena Sensitive Skin Serum Foundation

Neutrogena · Makeup

Neutrogena Sensitive Skin Serum Foundation

Good

Low PFAS risk likely, but brand discloses nothing about formulation.

Verdict · SkipLow PFAS risk, no major hazards on record for this formulation; standard cosmetic precautions apply.

Liquid foundations rarely contain intentional PFAS, but Neutrogena provides no public ingredient disclosure or PFAS statement. Standard cosmetic risk remains uncertain without full transparency.

The better-graded swap

Dior Forever Skin Wear Blurring Natural Matte Foundation

Dior

Dior Forever Skin Wear Blurring Natural Matte Foundation

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

liquid foundation with emollients and pigments

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Neutrogena Sensitive Skin Serum Foundation is made of, ingredients and materials

Neutrogena Sensitive Skin Serum Foundation is a liquid emulsion combining water, silicones, and iron oxide pigments typical of modern foundations. The 'serum' component refers to added emollients and humectants that reduce irritation risk compared to matte formulas. Liquid foundations rely on preservative systems and emulsifiers to stay stable; this product's sensitivity positioning suggests it avoids known irritants like high fragrance load or alcohol, but the actual preservative package and pigment sourcing are not publicly detailed by the brand.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

Iron oxides are regulated cosmetic colorants but sourcing and impurity testing vary by supplier. Neutrogena does not publicly disclose pigment origin or independent heavy metal assay results for this product.

Source, FDA ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Product is marketed as sensitive-skin appropriate, suggesting minimal added fragrance, but ingredient list does not explicitly state fragrance-free status. Undisclosed fragrance compounds can trigger reactions in sensitive individuals.

70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (non-intentional contaminant)

Silicones and certain emulsifiers used in liquid foundations may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of manufacturing. Neutrogena does not publish solvent residue testing or removal protocols.

70/ 100
⏳

Preservative system degradation and microbial growth

Liquid emulsions are water-based and prone to bacterial or fungal contamination if preservative efficacy declines over time or if product is stored in humid conditions or contaminated during use.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No evidence this product uses formaldehyde-releasing preservatives; modern liquid foundations typically use phenoxyethanol, methylisothiazolinone, or parabens instead. Brand does not specify the preservative system.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Neutrogena (Johnson & Johnson subsidiary) has no established recalls specific to this serum foundation and maintains a general commitment to safety compliance. However, the brand is notably silent on detailed ingredient sourcing, heavy metal limits in pigments, and preservative choices, which is typical for mass-market cosmetics but leaves gaps in transparency. Neutrogena does not publish third-party testing results or independent certifications for individual products in this line. The brand's PFAS stance is undisclosed, consistent with industry-wide reluctance to address the issue publicly.

How it compares in its category

Sensitive skin foundations in this price range typically use iron oxides and mica for color, similar to this product. Neutrogena's liquid serum format is less prone to airborne talc exposure than powder alternatives, a relevant advantage given talc contamination concerns in cosmetics. Indie and dermatologist-endorsed brands often disclose pigment suppliers and preservative types more openly, but this Neutrogena product sits at the mainstream end where ingredient transparency is less common. The 'sensitive' claim places it mid-range in terms of formulation restraint, not at the level of clinical or hypoallergenic lines.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve emulsifier stability and prevent preservative degradation. Do not expose to heat above 40°C (104°F) or freeze. Discontinue immediately if redness, swelling, or itching develops; sensitive skin claims do not guarantee individual tolerance. Replace every 12 months after opening or if you notice separation, discoloration, or odor change, as liquid foundations lose efficacy and preservative integrity over time.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Neutrogena has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Neutrogena Sensitive Skin Serum Foundation?

  • water, hyaluronic acid, glycerin, pigments, emollients
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • 1,4-dioxane contamination from emulsifiers

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Anastasia Beverly Hills

86 Products

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • pigments, oils, waxes, polymers (standard cosmetic formulations)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens or 1,4-dioxane in fragrances

Anastasia Beverly Hills

Beauty Makeup

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • pigments, waxes, oils, talc, mica
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens

More makeup grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.