PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall7/ 100Bad
Pirate's Booty Popcorn - 40 ct

Pirate's Booty · Microwave Popcorn

Pirate's Booty Popcorn - 40 ct

Poor

Limited info on bag liner treatment. Avoid if PFAS-sensitive.

Verdict: SkipGrease-resistant bag liner likely contains PFAS; no other established food-contact hazards documented, but opaque composition and brand silence warrant caution if PFAS-sensitive.

Pirate's Booty uses grease-resistant packaging but does not disclose liner composition or PFAS status. Standard popcorn bag coatings often contain PFAS; no independent testing available for this product.

The safe swap

Pirate's Booty Aged White Cheddar Pokemon Puffs

Pirate's Booty

Pirate's Booty Aged White Cheddar Pokemon Puffs

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

grease-resistant bag liner, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Grease-resistant packaging coatings almost universally contain fluorinated compounds (PFAS). No testing data for this specific product has been published; worst-case assumes legacy high-fluorination formulas. Migration into fatty popcorn cannot be ruled out.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100

What’s reassuring

🍼

BPA & bisphenols

No recalls or confirmed BPA/BPS contamination reported for Pirate's Booty bags. Modern multi-layer film typically avoids polycarbonate, so bisphenol contamination is unlikely but not explicitly ruled out by the brand.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Phthalate plasticizers in flexible film

Flexible multilayer pouches may contain phthalates; however, no published data or alerts exist for this product. Food-contact regulations in the US restrict certain phthalates, so direct contamination risk is lower than in non-food applications.

95/ 100

Microplastic shedding from bag degradation

No evidence of premature bag failure or flaking in normal storage. Popcorn is a dry product with low heat exposure; risk of microplastic ingestion from bag breakdown is minimal under typical use.

95/ 100

Ink or adhesive leachables from printed exterior

Outer printed layer is not in direct contact with popcorn. No documented incidents of ink migration; standard food-safe inks are required by regulation. Risk is negligible if bag integrity is maintained.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Pirate's Booty pouches use a multi-layer plastic bag with a grease-resistant inner liner, standard for preventing oil migration into cardboard or outer packaging. The specific fluorinated compound (PFAS type and concentration) is not disclosed publicly by the brand. Grease-resistant food packaging typically achieves this barrier using polyfluorinated treatments; the degree of migration into the popcorn itself depends on bag construction, storage temperature, and product contact time. Without specification sheets, the exact formulation and potential leaching profile cannot be independently verified.

The brand's record and disclosure

Pirate's Booty (owned by Robert's American Gourmet, part of Amplify Snack Brands) does not publicly disclose PFAS use or migration testing for its packaging. The brand has not released statements on phasing out fluorinated coatings or pursuing PFAS-free alternatives. No formal recalls or safety violations specific to packaging composition have been established in public records. The silence on fluorinated additives is typical for many snack manufacturers but represents a lack of transparency on a known concern.

How it compares in its category

Most commercial popcorn and snack bags use grease-resistant liners; Pirate's Booty is not unique in this regard. Brands like Simply Balanced and some organic popcorn lines have begun marketing PFAS-free or non-fluorinated alternatives, though not universally. Pirate's Booty does not advertise PFAS-conscious packaging, placing it in the mainstream category where fluorinated barriers remain the default. Price and market positioning favor conventional coatings over premium alternatives.

If you buy it

Store unopened bags at room temperature away from heat sources; elevated temperatures may slightly increase PFAS migration from the liner into contents. Transfer popcorn to an airtight glass or metal container once opened to limit extended contact with the bag. If you are pregnant, nursing, or have known PFAS sensitivity, consider PFAS-free snack brands as a precaution. Check the brand's website periodically for any updated packaging disclosures or reformulation announcements.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Pirate's Booty has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Microwave Popcorn

Pirate's Booty Cheddar Blast Puffs

Pirate's Booty

Cheddar Blast Puffs

paperboard bag with standard food-contact lining

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade58Good
⛏️

Polymer food-contact lining leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic fragmentation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture barrier failure and mold/bacterial growth

Limited concern

70

Lower concern snack. Standard food packaging, no known PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

Pirate's Booty Aged White Cheddar Pokemon Puffs

Pirate's Booty

Aged White Cheddar Pokemon Puffs

paper/cardboard packaging, puffed corn snack

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade66Good
⚠️

Mold or mycotoxin growth on damp packaging

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; typical snack packaging without known PFAS treatment.

Risky category by default

More microwave popcorn grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.