PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall3/ 100Bad
SkinnyPop & Pirate’s Booty Grab & Go Assortment Popcorn & Puffs

Pirate's Booty · Microwave Popcorn

SkinnyPop & Pirate’s Booty Grab & Go Assortment Popcorn & Puffs

Poor

Grease-resistant food packaging; PFAS use undisclosed by brand.

Verdict: SkipPaper-based grease barrier likely contains PFAS; no brand disclosure on coating chemistry. Safe for occasional use; priority should be PFAS reduction demand.

Grab-and-go popcorn packaging likely uses water- and grease-resistant coating, common sources of PFAS in food contact paper. Brand makes no public PFAS disclosure or commitment.

The safe swap

Pirate's Booty Cheddar Blast Puffs

Pirate's Booty

Pirate's Booty Cheddar Blast Puffs

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

paper-based food packaging with grease-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Paper-based grease barrier coatings in snack packaging are predominantly PFAS-based industry-wide. No brand disclosure; migration risk is low at room temperature but increases if package is heated or foods are transferred while warm.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🍳

Coating migration under temperature stress

While not tested for this specific product, paper coatings can leach into fatty foods (popcorn, cheese puffs) if exposed to elevated temperatures during storage or transport. Risk is minimal under normal retail and home storage conditions.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🫧

Microplastics

No reports of this product's packaging shedding particles or breaking down prematurely under normal use. Coating integrity is typically stable over the product shelf life.

Source: EPA
95/ 100

Ink or dye hazards in printing

Food packaging inks are regulated by FDA and are inert on the exterior surface; migration into food is not a documented concern for standard snack packaging printing.

95/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Paper-based packaging does not typically use BPA or phthalate-containing adhesives in food-contact layers; this hazard class is relevant to plastic films but not established for this product category.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is paper-based flexible packaging with a grease-resistant coating designed to contain oily snacks like popcorn and cheese puffs. The coating is almost certainly a fluorinated compound (PFAS-based) or silicone, applied to prevent oil migration and package degradation. The paper substrate itself is typically food-grade bleached kraft or similar, which is inert under normal conditions; the hazard profile depends entirely on what that coating is and whether it migrates into the food under storage or temperature stress.

The brand's record and disclosure

Pirate's Booty (owned by Robert's American Gourmet, a subsidiary of Amplify Snack Brands) has not publicly disclosed the chemical identity of its grease-resistant packaging coatings. Industry investigation and legal filings (notably a 2021 lawsuit in Vermont) confirm widespread use of PFAS in food packaging by major snack makers, though Pirate's Booty has not been specifically named in recalls. The brand provides no third-party certifications (e.g., PFAS-free claims) and does not list coating chemistry on packaging or corporate sustainability statements.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream popcorn and puffed snack packaging uses similar grease-resistant coatings; this product is not an outlier. Alternatives marketed as PFAS-free (some organic or premium brands) are available but cost substantially more and remain hard to verify independently. Standard paper-based snack packaging in this price tier is virtually indistinguishable in its coating chemistry across brands, making this a category-wide issue rather than a brand-specific failure.

If you buy it

Store at room temperature in a cool, dry place; do not heat the package or transfer contents while in the bag under high heat, as this may increase coating migration into food. The product is shelf-stable and poses no degradation or leaching risk during normal storage at ambient conditions. If concerned about PFAS, prioritize reducing frequency of consumption and voice demand to manufacturer for PFAS-free alternatives. Recycle the packaging as contaminated paper (check local rules) rather than composting.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Pirate's Booty has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Microwave Popcorn

Pirate's Booty Cheddar Blast Puffs

Pirate's Booty

Cheddar Blast Puffs

paperboard bag with standard food-contact lining

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade58Good
⛏️

Polymer food-contact lining leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic fragmentation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture barrier failure and mold/bacterial growth

Limited concern

70

Lower concern snack. Standard food packaging, no known PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

Pirate's Booty Aged White Cheddar Pokemon Puffs

Pirate's Booty

Aged White Cheddar Pokemon Puffs

paper/cardboard packaging, puffed corn snack

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade66Good
⚠️

Mold or mycotoxin growth on damp packaging

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; typical snack packaging without known PFAS treatment.

Risky category by default

More microwave popcorn grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.