PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Prestige Diamond Shield Non-Stick 3 Piece pan Set-milkpan, 16 and 18cm saucepans, Aluminium

Prestige · Cookware

Prestige Diamond Shield Non-Stick 3 Piece pan Set-milkpan, 16 and 18cm saucepans, Aluminium

Bad

Coating composition undisclosed, making PFAS risk impossible to assess.

Verdict: SkipAluminum cookware with undisclosed non-stick coating; moderate risk if coating degrades or overheated, manageable with proper use and maintenance.

Prestige gives no coating details or PFAS information for this three-piece set. While the aluminum base presents lower concern, the nonstick surface composition remains a mystery.

The safe swap

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Aluminium with unspecified non-stick coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating/non-stick coating fume risk (thermal decomposition)

Coating type is undisclosed; if Teflon-type coating-based, overheating above 500F can release fluorinated polymeric fumes. Risk is low with normal stovetop use but real if pans are left unattended or exposed to high direct heat.

70/ 100
🔩

Aluminum leaching into food

Bare aluminum or thin coatings can leach into acidic or salty foods (tomatoes, citrus, vinegar). The undisclosed coating thickness/type means you cannot confirm barrier adequacy. Long-term aluminum accumulation is debated but flagged by some health agencies at high dietary levels.

45/ 100
🍂

Coating degradation and flaking over time

Budget non-stick cookware typically shows surface wear within 1-3 years of regular use. Once coating begins to flake or peel, continued cooking risks ingesting coating particles and exposing reactive aluminum underneath; replacement is necessary.

20/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed chemical composition

Prestige does not publicly specify whether the non-stick coating is Teflon-type coating, ceramic, silicone, or hybrid; this prevents independent assessment of heating safety limits or long-term off-gassing potential. This lack of transparency is a consumer information hazard even if the coating itself is safe.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No evidence of enameled surfaces on this bare aluminum product, but if any colored decorative coating exists on handles or rims, third-party testing would be needed to rule out heavy metal pigments. Not confirmed in available product literature.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This set uses aluminum as the base metal, which is lightweight and conducts heat well but is inherently reactive with acidic foods. The non-stick coating type is not specified by Prestige, which is a significant gap since modern coatings range from Teflon-type coating-based (heat-sensitive) to ceramic or silicone alternatives (more stable). Without manufacturer transparency on the specific coating chemistry, you cannot assess whether it contains PFOA-free or PFAS-containing compounds, or how resistant it is to degradation under normal kitchen use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Prestige is a major Indian cookware manufacturer owned by TTK Prestige Ltd, established in the Indian market since 1955. The brand has not publicly released detailed safety data sheets or coating composition information for this product line. No major recalls or documented health controversies have been identified in public records for this specific product, but the lack of proactive PFAS or chemical transparency is consistent with many mainstream cookware brands that do not volunteer detailed material certifications to consumers.

How it compares in its category

This three-piece set is positioned as budget-friendly non-stick aluminum cookware. It sits below premium brands like All-Clad or Le Creuset (which disclose coatings and offer longer warranties) and roughly level with mass-market brands like Calphalon or T-fal that similarly do not always fully disclose non-stick chemistry upfront. The aluminum-with-unknown-coating approach is standard for budget segments but carries higher uncertainty about coating durability and composition compared to established hard-anodized or ceramic-coated alternatives.

If you buy it

Keep temperatures below medium-high heat; non-stick coatings degrade faster at sustained high temperatures, risking fume release and coating flaking. Avoid metal utensils and abrasive scrubbing, which accelerate coating failure. Hand wash only (not dishwasher) to extend coating life. Replace the pans if the non-stick surface visibly chips, peels, or becomes rough, as continued use may expose aluminum or release coating fragments. Do not preheat empty pans, which can overheat the coating; always add oil or food before heating.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Prestige has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.