PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Rachael Ray Cook + Create Hard Anodized Nonstick Frying Pan

Rachael Ray · Cookware

Rachael Ray Cook + Create Hard Anodized Nonstick Frying Pan

Bad

Nonstick coating chemistry not stated for this hard anodized aluminum pan.

Verdict · SkipHard anodized base presents no hazard of this kind on record; nonstick coating type unknown and brand has not disclosed PFAS information. Requires cautious use and monitoring for degradation.

This hard anodized aluminum frying pan is marketed with a nonstick coating, but the coating type and chemistry are not disclosed. Rachael Ray has no PFAS statement on record for this product.

The better-graded swap

Heritage Steel Fry Pan

Heritage Steel

Heritage Steel Fry Pan

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

hard anodized aluminum with nonstick coating, type unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Is Rachael Ray Cook + Create Hard Anodized non-toxic? What it is made of

This pan uses hard anodized aluminum as its core, which undergoes electrochemical treatment to create a dense oxide layer that resists corrosion and leaching. The nonstick coating type is not disclosed by the brand, which is the critical gap. Hard anodized aluminum itself does not leach problematic aluminum levels under normal cooking, but the nonstick surface chemistry determines whether Teflon-type coating, PFOA, or PFAS alternatives are present. The combination of these two materials is common in mid-range cookware, but transparency about the coating is essential for informed purchase.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed as non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

60/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (thermal degradation)

If the nonstick coating is Teflon-type coating-based, overheating above 500F can produce fumes. The product lacks explicit temperature warnings or coating type disclosure, making risk assessment difficult.

70/ 100
⏳

Coating degradation and migration

Nonstick coatings on mid-range hard anodized pans are susceptible to chipping, flaking, and scratching over time. Once compromised, coating particles can enter food; exact composition of degraded material is unknown without disclosure.

45/ 100
🏷️

Lack of material transparency

Brand silence on nonstick coating type, PFAS status, and manufacturing certifications is a red flag for informed consumers. Inability to verify coating chemistry prevents full safety assessment and limits recourse if health concerns emerge.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Aluminum leaching

Hard anodization significantly reduces aluminum ion release compared to bare aluminum. No reports of elevated aluminum levels from hard anodized cookware under normal use. Acidic foods may cause minor leaching, but levels are lower concern for cookware use.

95/ 100
🧠

Lead

This product does not appear to use enameled or glazed surfaces on the cooking area. Hard anodized surfaces do not rely on ceramic coatings, so this hazard class is not applicable.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Rachael Ray cookware does not publicly disclose nonstick coating chemistry or provide certifications like GFSI, NSF, or PFOA-free pledges on product pages. The brand has not faced major documented recalls or safety controversies specific to this line, but the absence of transparency on PFAS status is noteworthy given industry movement toward disclosure. No independent testing results of this specific product are on record in public databases.

How it compares in its category

Hard anodized aluminum nonstick pans occupy the mid-market segment. Competitors like Calphalon and T-fal also use hard anodized bases but often label their coating explicitly (e.g., 'Teflon-type coating-free' or 'ceramic-reinforced'). Premium brands like All-Clad and Le Creuset tend to offer greater material transparency and longer warranties. Budget nonstick pans from unknown manufacturers carry higher risk of coating degradation and unlabeled coatings. This Rachael Ray product sits in a crowded, murky middle where brand recognition does not guarantee material clarity.

If you buy it

Avoid temperatures above 500F; most nonstick coatings begin to degrade or off-gas at higher heat. Hand-wash only; dishwashers accelerate coating wear. Inspect the cooking surface regularly for scratches, peeling, or discoloration; replace the pan if the coating shows signs of flaking or wear. Store with protective padding to avoid impact damage. Use wooden or silicone utensils exclusively to prevent scratching the nonstick layer.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rachael Ray has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Cookware

Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan

Made In

Stainless Clad Fry Pan

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Clad separation or delamination over time
MADE IN 10' Stainless Clad Frying Pan

Made In

10' Stainless Clad Frying Pan

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Nickel leaching from stainless steel

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Heritage Steel Eater Fry Pan

Heritage Steel

Eater Fry Pan

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Clad stainless steel, no coating
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Metal ion release during cooking (iron, nickel, chromium)

More cookware grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.