PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall57/ 100Good

Rare Beauty · Makeup

Rare Beauty - 46 Products

Excellent

Cosmetics product line; no PFAS disclosure but lower concern category.

Verdict · BuyRare Beauty cosmetics show no established heavy metal or formaldehyde concerns; PFAS profile lower-risk; brand transparency modest but no recalled hazards on record.

Rare Beauty cosmetics contain typical makeup ingredients like pigments and oils. No public PFAS claims or third-party testing available; category poses lower risk than water-resistant apparel or nonstick cookware.

Find it on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

pigments, oils, waxes, powders

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Rare Beauty - 46 Products is made of, ingredients and materials

Rare Beauty products across its 46-item line use pigments, oils, waxes, and powders typical of modern cosmetics. Pigments are the primary concern class in color cosmetics because some iron oxides, titanium dioxide, and synthetic colorants can carry heavy metal contaminants or allergens if sourced or manufactured without strict control. Oils and waxes (common in foundations, concealers, and lip products) are generally low-hazard but can be vehicles for impurities if not refined. Powder formulations carry microinhalation risk if talc is used, though talc itself is not inherently a cosmetic hazard unless contaminated with asbestos.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🧠

Lead

Iron oxide and synthetic colorants in Rare Beauty's 46 products are not independently tested or disclosed for heavy metal content. Mainstream cosmetic brands typically comply with FDA limits (100 ppm lead in color additives) but do not routinely publish test results; absence of disclosed testing does not confirm absence of risk.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane in fragrances or emulsifiers

1,4-dioxane is a trace contaminant in some cosmetic-grade surfactants and fragrance oils, not intentionally added. Rare Beauty does not disclose supplier controls or third-party contaminant screening for this compound.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens (limonene, linalool, citral, eugenol)

Rare Beauty products, particularly lip glosses, liquid blushes, and highlighters, list 'fragrance' or 'parfum' as an ingredient. Individual allergen components are not disclosed; sensitive individuals should cross-reference full ingredient lists or perform patch tests.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) have been reported in Rare Beauty formulations, and modern prestige brands typically avoid these older agents. However, detailed preservative disclosures are not publicly available.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Talc contamination with asbestos (if talc is used)

Rare Beauty does not disclose whether talc or talc-free mineral powders are used in powder formulations. FDA regulations prohibit asbestos-contaminated talc, and no talc-related contamination has been reported for this brand; however, formulation details remain unclear.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Rare Beauty, a Sephora-exclusive brand launched in 2020 by Selena Gomez, has not published detailed ingredient sourcing, heavy metal testing, or allergen screening protocols publicly. The brand does not disclose third-party certifications (e.g., Leaping Bunny, EWG Verified) or independent heavy metal assay results. No product recalls for lead, cadmium, formaldehyde, or 1,4-dioxane have been reported by FDA or consumer safety databases as of available records. The brand's PFAS stance is silent, consistent with most mass-market cosmetics that do not emphasize water-resistance claims.

How it compares in its category

Rare Beauty sits in the mainstream prestige cosmetics segment, pricing and formulation closer to brands like Fenty Beauty and Charlotte Tilbury than to clinical or indie brands with posted heavy metal limits. Most mainstream color cosmetics in this tier do not publish pigment testing or allergen panels beyond regulatory minimums; Rare Beauty follows this norm. Compared to brands with explicit clean-beauty or toxicology-focused marketing (e.g., Tower 28, Juice Beauty), Rare Beauty offers less documented safety assurance but also no higher inherent risk profile based on material class alone.

If you buy it

Patch test any new Rare Beauty product, especially cream or liquid formulations, on inner arm 24-48 hours before full face application to screen for pigment or fragrance sensitivity. Store products in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight; do not expose to high heat, which can alter emulsions and concentrate any trace impurities. Replace liquid and cream products every 6-12 months and powders every 12-18 months to minimize bacterial or mold growth. If you have a history of heavy metal sensitivity or are pregnant, consider requesting independent heavy metal assay results from the brand or consulting a dermatologist before use.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rare Beauty has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More makeup grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.