Rare Beauty by Selena Gomez
Cosmetics carry low typical PFAS risk; brand offers no specific disclosure.
Rare Beauty cosmetics use standard formulations without known PFAS-prone coatings or treatments. No PFAS claims or certifications publicly available; mainstream cosmetic category suggests lower concern.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
pigments, binders, waxes, oils in cosmetic formulations
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Rare Beauty by Selena Gomez is made of, ingredients and materials
Rare Beauty products are conventional cosmetic formulations combining pigments (iron oxides, mica, synthetics), binders (silicones, film-formers), waxes, and oils. Iron oxides and mica are industry-standard colorants with established safety profiles at cosmetic concentrations. Synthetic pigments and dyes used in color cosmetics are regulated by the FDA's Color Additives list, which restricts known toxic compounds. The presence of multiple waxes and oils means the formula is designed to minimize irritation but also means patch-testing is wise for sensitive skin.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Rare Beauty does not disclose full preservative systems on marketing materials. Some conventional cosmetics use formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) at regulated levels; if used, these are present at low concentration but may trigger sensitivity in susceptible users.
Source, ATSDR ↗Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components
Rare Beauty scented products list fragrance as a single ingredient rather than itemizing volatile components. Fragrance blends can contain allergens (limonene, linalool, eugenol) at unlisted concentrations; reactions are typically mild irritation but may be severe in individuals with fragrance sensitivity or existing dermatitis.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Lead
No recalls or public test results documenting lead or cadmium exceedance in Rare Beauty products are on record. FDA-regulated Color Additives list restricts known toxic pigments, but the brand does not publish independent third-party heavy-metal testing results.
Source, ATSDR ↗Talc contamination in powder formulations
No recalls or quality-control incidents involving asbestos or talc contamination in Rare Beauty powders have been reported. Brand does not specify whether talc or talc-free mineral alternatives are used; if talc is present, finished product contamination with asbestos is rare in modern supply chains but not excluded by absence of disclosure.
1,4-dioxane (manufacturing byproduct in ethoxylated ingredients)
Rare Beauty does not publish surfactant or emulsifier sourcing or 1,4-dioxane analytical testing. If ethoxylated ingredients (polysorbates, PEG compounds) are present, residual 1,4-dioxane is possible but low risk under FDA oversight; brand silence on this is consistent with mainstream cosmetics practice.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Rare Beauty has not published detailed ingredient safety disclosures, material sourcing certifications (such as cruelty-free or clean-beauty third-party marks), or responses to heavy-metal testing inquiries on public record. The brand has not faced major recalls or substantiated safety allegations related to lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in pigments. Transparency is below that of premium indie or certified organic cosmetic brands, but absence of public incidents does not indicate testing or commitment to disclosure.
How it compares in its category
Rare Beauty sits in the mass-premium cosmetics tier, formulated similarly to brands like Fenty Beauty and MAC with conventional synthetic pigments and film-former chemistry. It does not carry third-party certifications for heavy-metal limits or clean-beauty standards the way some indie or certified organic brands do. In this segment, reliance on FDA Color Additives regulation is the baseline; additional testing or certification is voluntary and often absent.
If you buy it
Perform a patch test on inner arm or behind ear 24 hours before full application, especially if you have sensitive skin or dermatitis; many reports of irritation in this product category stem from fragrance or preservative sensitivity, not pigments. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to slow oxidation of oils and waxes. Replace liquid or cream formulations every 12 months and powder formulations every 18-24 months to minimize bacterial or mold growth. Discontinue use immediately if rash, redness, or swelling develops.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 60% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Rare Beauty has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
More makeup grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.