Rare Beauty - Makeup - 41 Products
Cosmetics portfolio; no PFAS disclosure available from brand.
Rare Beauty does not publicly disclose PFAS use or absence in its 41-product makeup line. Typical cosmetic formulations lower concern, but lack of transparency limits confidence.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
pigments, binders, oils, waxes, polymers
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Rare Beauty - Makeup - 41 Products is made of, ingredients and materials
Rare Beauty makeup contains pigments, binders (polymers and resins), oils, and waxes typical of conventional cosmetics. Pigments in eyeshadows, blushes, and lip products can carry heavy-metal contaminants (lead, cadmium, iron oxides) depending on supplier and regulatory oversight. Binders and film-forming polymers may include formaldehyde-releasing preservatives or resins to improve durability and water resistance.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Lead
Rare Beauty does not publicly disclose heavy-metal testing or pigment sourcing. Conventional cosmetic pigments can carry trace contaminants; cumulative exposure from multi-product use is not quantified for this brand.
Source, ATSDR ↗Formaldehyde / VOCs
Formaldehyde releasers (e.g., dmdm hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) are permitted in cosmetics but not listed on Rare Beauty labeling. No third-party screening data available; risk is contingent on specific product formulation.
Source, ATSDR ↗Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components
Rare Beauty products may contain fragrance; ingredient lists often hide specific aroma chemicals behind the term 'fragrance.' Undisclosed components can trigger contact dermatitis or respiratory sensitivity in sensitive individuals.
Polymer film degradation and leachables
Binders and film-forming polymers in long-wear formulas may degrade over time or when exposed to heat, potentially releasing monomers or additives. Rare Beauty does not specify polymer type or stability limits.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Talc contamination in powder products
No public disclosure from Rare Beauty confirms or excludes talc in its powder formulas. If talc is used, asbestos contamination risk is low in modern cosmetics under FDA oversight, but regulatory testing is not brand-specific.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Rare Beauty does not publicly disclose ingredient sourcing, heavy-metal testing protocols, or formaldehyde-releaser screening on its website or third-party safety databases. The brand is silent on PFAS use and does not list third-party certifications (e.g., Cruelty Free, Vegan, Clean Beauty standards that often mandate testing). No product recalls or FDA safety actions specific to Rare Beauty have been reported as of current public records.
How it compares in its category
Rare Beauty occupies the mainstream luxury-indie cosmetics tier, similar to brands like Glossier and e.l.f. Most competitors in this segment do not routinely publish heavy-metal or formaldehyde testing. Brands with higher transparency (e.g., Ilia, Westman Atelier) voluntarily test pigments and disclose third-party certifications; Rare Beauty does not. The 41-product range suggests broad pigment use across multiple formulations, increasing aggregate exposure risk if individual products lack heavy-metal screening.
If you buy it
Store makeup in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to slow polymer degradation and preserve binder integrity. Replace liquid and cream formulas every 6-12 months and powder products every 12-18 months to reduce bacterial growth and oxidation of oils. Avoid applying to broken or inflamed skin, as damaged skin barrier increases dermal absorption of pigments and additives. If you experience rash, itching, or irritation, discontinue use and patch-test on inner arm before reapplying.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Rare Beauty has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
More makeup grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.