PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Rimmel London Lasting Finish Foundation

Rimmel · Makeup

Rimmel London Lasting Finish Foundation

Excellent

No known PFAS risk. Routine cosmetic formula.

Verdict: BuyNo known PFAS or established safety red flags; routine liquid foundation with standard cosmetic hazard profile and no major brand controversies on record.

Lasting Finish Foundation is a standard liquid cosmetic with no waterproofing treatment or Teflon-family coating coatings documented. No public PFAS disclosures or lab data available; lower concern based on typical makeup chemistry.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

liquid foundation with pigments, emollients, silicones

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Rimmel does not disclose specific preservative systems publicly. Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin) are permitted in cosmetics up to safe thresholds but can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Full ingredient list should be checked on packaging or online for these compounds.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Rimmel Lasting Finish contains fragrance according to standard formulations. 'Fragrance' is a catch-all term and may include allergens (e.g., limonene, linalool) that trigger reactions in sensitive or fragrance-intolerant skin. Individual tolerance varies widely and is not predictable without patch testing.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial or fungal growth if improperly stored or used

Any liquid foundation is susceptible to contamination if left open, exposed to moisture, or stored in warm/humid conditions. Risk is not specific to Rimmel but depends on consumer hygiene (clean brush use, cap closure, shelf life compliance). This is a handling issue, not a formulation defect.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

FDA-approved colorants (CI numbers) used in cosmetic-grade foundations are tested for lead and cadmium limits, and no recalls for heavy-metal contamination in Rimmel Lasting Finish have been reported. Theoretical risk exists in any pigmented product but is not established for this brand.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Talc contamination in mineral pigments

Talc is not listed as an active ingredient in Rimmel Lasting Finish. Minor trace talc in mineral pigments (iron oxides, mica) is possible during manufacturing but is not documented as a known issue for this product and is present at negligible levels if at all in liquid formulas.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Rimmel Lasting Finish is a liquid foundation composed of water, silicones (for slip and blending), pigments (iron oxides, titanium dioxide, and synthetic colorants), and emollients. The silicone base is inert and widely used in cosmetics; pigments are regulated by FDA color certifications in most markets. The formula does not list talc as an active ingredient, reducing respiratory inhalation risk compared to powder foundations, though minor trace talc contamination in pigments is theoretically possible but not established for this product.

The brand's record and disclosure

Rimmel (owned by Coty Inc.) does not publicly disclose full ingredient sourcing or heavy-metal testing data, which is typical for mass-market drugstore brands but reflects weaker transparency than premium or indie brands. No major recalls or toxicity controversies have been widely documented for Rimmel foundations. The brand does not market itself on clean or safety credentials, positioning instead on affordability and shade range.

How it compares in its category

Liquid foundations across the category carry similar hazard profiles. Rimmel's silicone-based formula is more stable and less prone to separation than water-heavy competitors, reducing need for preservative load. The lack of talc in the stated formula is a modest advantage over some budget powder alternatives. Third-party testing and certifications (e.g., dermatologist-tested, hypoallergenic claims) are routine for this price point and do not distinguish Rimmel meaningfully from drugstore peers.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, moisturized skin to minimize irritation risk from pigments or preservatives. Discontinue immediately if redness, itching, or swelling develops; sensitivity to fragrance or preservatives is individual and not predictable. Replace every 12 months to avoid bacterial growth in the bottle. Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight; heat or light exposure can degrade preservatives and increase contamination risk over time.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rimmel has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More makeup grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.