Rimmel London Lasting Finish Foundation
No known PFAS risk. Routine cosmetic formula.
Lasting Finish Foundation is a standard liquid cosmetic with no waterproofing treatment or Teflon-family coating coatings documented. No public PFAS disclosures or lab data available; lower concern based on typical makeup chemistry.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
liquid foundation with pigments, emollients, silicones
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Rimmel London Lasting Finish Foundation is made of, ingredients and materials
Rimmel Lasting Finish is a liquid foundation composed of water, silicones (for slip and blending), pigments (iron oxides, titanium dioxide, and synthetic colorants), and emollients. The silicone base is inert and widely used in cosmetics; pigments are regulated by FDA color certifications in most markets. The formula does not list talc as an active ingredient, reducing respiratory inhalation risk compared to powder foundations, though minor trace talc contamination in pigments is theoretically possible but not established for this product.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Rimmel does not disclose specific preservative systems publicly. Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g.Imidazolidinyl urea and dmdm hydantoin are permitted in cosmetics up to regulated thresholds but can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Full ingredient list should be checked on packaging or online for these compounds.
Source, ATSDR ↗Fragrance allergens
Rimmel Lasting Finish contains fragrance according to standard formulations. 'Fragrance' is a catch-all term and may include allergens (e.g., limonene, linalool) that trigger reactions in sensitive or fragrance-intolerant skin. Individual tolerance varies widely and is not predictable without patch testing.
Bacterial or fungal growth if improperly stored or used
Any liquid foundation is susceptible to contamination if left open, exposed to moisture, or stored in warm/humid conditions. Risk is not specific to Rimmel but depends on consumer hygiene (clean brush use, cap closure, shelf life compliance). This is a handling issue, not a formulation defect.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Heavy metals
FDA-approved colorants (CI numbers) used in cosmetic-grade foundations are tested for lead and cadmium limits, and no recalls for heavy-metal contamination in Rimmel Lasting Finish have been reported. Theoretical risk exists in any pigmented product but is not established for this brand.
Source, FDA ↗Talc contamination in mineral pigments
Talc is not listed as an active ingredient in Rimmel Lasting Finish. Minor trace talc in mineral pigments (iron oxides, mica) is possible during manufacturing but is not documented as a known issue for this product and is present at negligible levels if at all in liquid formulas.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Rimmel (owned by Coty Inc.) does not publicly disclose full ingredient sourcing or heavy-metal testing data, which is typical for mass-market drugstore brands but reflects weaker transparency than premium or indie brands. No major recalls or toxicity controversies have been widely documented for Rimmel foundations. The brand does not market itself on clean or safety credentials, positioning instead on affordability and shade range.
How it compares in its category
Liquid foundations across the category carry similar hazard profiles. Rimmel's silicone-based formula is more stable and less prone to separation than water-heavy competitors, reducing need for preservative load. The lack of talc in the stated formula is a modest advantage over some budget powder alternatives. Third-party testing and certifications (e.g., dermatologist-tested, hypoallergenic claims) are routine for this price point and do not distinguish Rimmel meaningfully from drugstore peers.
If you buy it
Apply to clean, moisturized skin to minimize irritation risk from pigments or preservatives. Discontinue immediately if redness, itching, or swelling develops; sensitivity to fragrance or preservatives is individual and not predictable. Replace every 12 months to avoid bacterial growth in the bottle. Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight; heat or light exposure can degrade preservatives and increase contamination risk over time.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Rimmel has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
More makeup grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.