PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
RMS Beauty Lip Shine Color Moment

RMS Beauty · Lip Balm & Long-Wear Lipstick

RMS Beauty Lip Shine Color Moment

Excellent

Low risk; natural lip gloss without water-resistance claims or known treatment triggers.

Verdict · BuyPlant-based lip gloss with minimal established hazards; clean ingredient disclosure and lower PFAS profile support use with standard care.

This lip shine is based on plant oils and waxes with no disclosed water-resistant or stain-resistant treatments. Lip glosses rarely carry PFAS concerns unless formulators intentionally add Teflon-family coating, which is unlikely for RMS Beauty's clean ingredient focus.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Plant-based oils and waxes (lip shine/gloss)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What RMS Beauty Lip Shine Color Moment is made of, ingredients and materials

RMS Beauty Lip Shine Color Moment uses plant-based oils (such as jojoba, rosehip, or similar botanical extracts) and natural waxes as its primary matrix, avoiding synthetic polymers and silicones common in conventional lip glosses. This formulation eliminates Teflon-type coating (non-stick Teflon-family coating) risks and reduces the likelihood of microplastic shedding or accumulation in the product over time. Plant oil-based glosses are generally stable at room and body temperature, with no known leaching of heavy metals or synthetic plasticizers from the base formula itself.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and essential oil sensitization

Plant-based lip glosses often contain fragrance compounds or essential oil extracts; while RMS Beauty typically emphasizes clean ingredients, natural fragrance sources (e.g., rose, citrus extracts) can trigger contact dermatitis or sensitization in individuals with known fragrance allergies. No specific recalls or complaints on record for this product, but patch testing is recommended for sensitiv

70/ 100
⚠️

Microbial growth and rancidity in plant oils

Plant oils (jojoba, rosehip) naturally oxidize and can support microbial growth if stored improperly or if preservative levels are minimal. RMS Beauty products typically use natural preservative systems; no recalls for contamination are on record, but shelf life and storage conditions matter more than in synthetic formulations.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Color pigments in plant-based lip glosses can theoretically carry trace heavy metals (cadmium, lead) if sourced from contaminated botanical material or iron oxides. RMS Beauty does not publish heavy metal testing data for this product; this reflects a broader industry gap rather than a documented problem with this brand.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Clean beauty brands typically avoid formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) in favor of alternatives with lower concern for this hazard. No evidence that RMS Beauty uses these agents, but product ingredient lists should be reviewed if you have formaldehyde sensitivity.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

1,4-dioxane contamination from manufacturing

This trace contaminant can appear in cosmetics through synthesis of certain emulsifiers or surfactants. Plant-oil-based formulas without synthetic detergent systems face lower risk; RMS Beauty's clean positioning suggests minimal use of high-risk ingredients, though independent testing is not publicly available.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

RMS Beauty markets itself as a clean beauty brand with emphasis on plant-derived and minimalist formulations. The brand does not prominently publicize PFAS testing results, nor does it make explicit water-resistance or durability claims that would typically trigger intentional PFAS treatment in cosmetics. Public records show no FDA warnings, recalls, or substantiated safety controversies specific to this product line. The brand maintains ingredient transparency on packaging and website, though third-party verified certifications (e.g., EWG, Clean Beauty Bureau) are limited.

How it compares in its category

Conventional lip glosses often rely on silicone polymers, synthetic resins, or film-forming agents that can accumulate on lips and require frequent reapplication. RMS Beauty's plant-oil approach sits at the cleaner end of the spectrum, avoiding petroleum-derived synthetic polymers. In practice, plant-based formulas typically offer shorter wear time and less water resistance than synthetic alternatives, which is a trade-off rather than a safety liability. This product aligns with the 'clean beauty' category standard but offers fewer durability features than mainstream glosses.

If you buy it

Store at cool room temperature to prevent oil separation or rancidity over time; check for off-odors or discoloration before use, particularly after 12-18 months. Apply sparingly to avoid excess product transfer to surfaces or clothing. If the formula feels unusually thick or separated, discard and replace. No special precautions needed for skin contact or ingestion of small amounts; plant oils in lip products are designed for oral contact and carry minimal acute toxicity risk at typical use levels.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
RMS Beauty has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More lip balm & long-wear lipstick grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.