PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall14/ 100Bad
SealLine Bigfork Dry Daypack

SealLine · Waterproof Bags & Luggage

SealLine Bigfork Dry Daypack

Poor

Likely contains water-repellent coating, but brand discloses nothing about PFAS content.

Verdict · SkipNylon daypack with unknown water-repellent coating chemistry poses moderate PFAS risk; no brand transparency or recalls on record. Usable with awareness.

SealLine daypacks typically use nylon with water-repellent coating treatment for water resistance. The brand does not publicly share anything about PFAS use or alternatives, making assessment difficult.

The better-graded swap

Granite Gear ToughSack Assorted Colors

Granite Gear

Granite Gear ToughSack Assorted Colors

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon fabric with water-repellent coating waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Nylon daypacks routinely use fluorinated water-repellent coating; SealLine's silence on chemistry strongly suggests conventional PFAS-based formulation. Accumulation risk is low for occasional outdoor use but non-negligible with frequent washing or wear near skin.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and particle shedding

Water-repellent coating coatings wear over time and shed microparticles, particularly with washing. If the coating contains legacy long-chain PFAS, degradation accelerates release into wash water and potentially onto skin/clothing.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from nylon

Nylon is a microplastic source during washing and normal wear friction. The Bigfork's synthetic fibers will gradually shed particles; risk is environmental and ingestion-pathway minor rather than direct toxicological concern during use.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Dyes and synthetic polymer off-gassing

Nylon fabric itself poses minimal formaldehyde or volatile organic compound risk under normal ambient storage and use. No recalls or test reports document off-gassing from SealLine packs.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Daypack fabric colorants are not known to concentrate heavy metals in a way that creates user exposure. SealLine has no reported violations of textile heavy metal limits.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Bigfork uses nylon fabric treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating to shed water without full waterproofing. water-repellent coating coatings are the primary vector for PFAS in outdoor gear because traditional formulations rely on fluorochemicals for their water-and-grease-resistant properties. Nylon itself is a synthetic polymer with low leaching risk under normal use, but the coating's composition is critical. SealLine does not disclose whether this pack uses legacy long-chain PFAS, newer short-chain alternatives, or non-fluorinated water-repellent coating, leaving the exposure profile unclear.

The brand's record and disclosure

SealLine (owned by Cascade Designs) maintains no publicly available PFAS commitment or testing transparency for its products. The brand has not published materials sourcing statements, third-party certifications (such as bluesign or OEKO-TEX), or responses to PFAS inquiries. No recalls or regulatory actions are documented for SealLine daypacks. This silence is typical of mid-tier outdoor brands and reflects neither culpability nor innocence, but makes informed purchasing difficult.

How it compares in its category

Nylon daypacks with water-repellent coating coatings are industry standard for water resistance. Premium competitors (e.g., Patagonia, Arc'teryx) increasingly disclose fluorinated vs. non-fluorinated options or commit to PFAS phase-out timelines. Budget and mid-tier brands like SealLine rarely provide this detail. A non-coated nylon pack or one with silicone-based water-repellent coating would present lower concern for PFAS but sacrifice water repellency; this pack sits in the typical convenience-vs-transparency trade-off.

If you buy it

Wash the pack infrequently in cold water by hand or gentle machine cycle to minimize shedding of coating particles and any leachable residues. Avoid high heat (dryers, direct sunlight for extended periods) which can degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially mobilize components. Do not use perfluorinated fabric treatments or heavy-duty waterproofing products as touch-ups, which compound PFAS exposure. Replace when seams fail or coating becomes visibly worn rather than storing indefinitely, as degradation may increase chemical mobility.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
SealLine has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Bags & Luggage

Kelty Daisy Chain Web Duffel Bag

Kelty

Daisy Chain Web Duffel Bag

Polyester webbing and nylon

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade69Good
🎨

Azo dyes in polyester webbing

Limited concern

70
💨

Adhesive and seam-tape volatiles (VOC)

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from webbing degradation

Limited concern

70

Standard duffel bag, low PFAS risk but no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Granite Gear ToughSack Assorted Colors

Granite Gear

ToughSack Assorted Colors

Cordura nylon fabric

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Durable nylon pack without water treatment applied.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Salomon Extended Totebag

Salomon

Extended Totebag

polyester/nylon tote fabric, standard construction

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony trioxide in polyester

Limited concern

70
♾️

PFAS

Moderate concern

45
💨

VOC off-gassing from dyes and finishes

Limited concern

70

Standard tote with lower PFAS risk but no brand confirmation.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof bags & luggage grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.