PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall14/ 100Bad
Spiderwire Ultracast Braid

Spiderwire · Fishing Line

Spiderwire Ultracast Braid

Good

Skip or contact brand; fishing line coatings often hide PFAS without disclosure.

Verdict: SkipBraided polyethylene line with undisclosed coating hides potential chemical risks; acceptable with awareness of PFAS uncertainty and coating durability limits.

Braided polyethylene marketed for durability and castability, but SpiderWire discloses nothing about PFAS in coatings or treatments. Braided synthetics often use Teflon-family coating coatings containing PFAS.

The safe swap

Cortland Silent Flip Braided Fishing Line

Cortland

Cortland Silent Flip Braided Fishing Line

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Braided polyethylene fishing line with undisclosed coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

Has a special coating but the exact formula is secret.

75/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from braided structure

Braided construction sheds tiny PE fibers during casting, retrieval, and knot tying. These microplastics accumulate in waterways and can be ingested by fish and wildlife; no data on whether degraded coating fragments add chemical burden to shed fibers.

20/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed coating additives with potential leaching

The proprietary Ultracast coating likely contains slip agents, wetting additives, or fluorochemicals to reduce friction. Without disclosure, chemical identity is unknown; coating breakdown over time, especially in saltwater or UV, may release these additives into the aquatic environment.

70/ 100

UV degradation and polymer fragmentation

Polyethylene braids inherently degrade under UV and mechanical stress, fragmenting into smaller particles over months of use. Accumulated evidence from oceanography studies shows braided fishing line is a major source of microplastics in marine environments; coating breakdown accelerates particle generation.

45/ 100
🍳

Dermal or ingestion risk from handled coating residue

Frequent anglers handling Ultracast line without gloves may absorb coating chemicals through skin or ingest particles via hand-to-mouth contact. Risk is low but unquantified given the lack of coating safety data; no reported cases of acute toxicity from fishing line contact.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

Spiderwire Ultracast Braid is typically dyed green, moss, or yellow using azo or anthraquinone dyes. No recalls or reports of cadmium or lead in fishing line dyes, but dye composition is not routinely tested or disclosed by manufacturers.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Spiderwire Ultracast Braid is extruded braided polyethylene (PE), a synthetic polymer chosen for strength-to-diameter ratio and low stretch. The "Ultracast" designation signals a proprietary surface coating applied post-extrusion to reduce friction and improve castability, but Spiderwire has not publicly disclosed the coating chemistry. Braided construction means multiple thin PE strands are woven together, creating microscopic gaps where coating materials can lodge and degrade over time with UV, saltwater, or mechanical abrasion.

The brand's record and disclosure

Spiderwire (owned by Pure Fishing/Newell Brands) does not publicly disclose coating composition, fluorochemistry, or third-party safety certifications for this line. No major recalls or safety warnings on record for Ultracast Braid specifically. The company's silence on PFAS and coating additives is typical across the fishing line industry, where trade secret protection often prevents end-user scrutiny of proprietary surface treatments.

How it compares in its category

Braided PE lines dominate tournament and saltwater fishing due to sensitivity and strength; Spiderwire is a mainstream mid-to-premium option. Compared to monofilament (single nylon strand), braided lines expose more surface area for coatings and shed microfibers more readily during use. Compared to high-end branded braids (PowerPro, Suffix), Spiderwire offers similar material but equal opacity on coating safety; no brand in this category voluntarily discloses fluorochemical content.

If you buy it

Store spools in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to slow UV-driven coating breakdown and leaching. Inspect line every 2-3 months for visible whitening, fraying, or slime-like residue on the braid, signs the coating is degrading. Replace line annually if used frequently in saltwater; freshwater use can extend life to 18-24 months. Wash hands after extended handling, especially before eating, as abraded coating particles and residual chemicals can transfer to food.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Spiderwire has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Fishing Line

BERKLEY TRILENE BIG GAME

Berkley

TRILENE BIG GAME

monofilament nylon fishing line

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade63Good

UV degradation and embrittlement

High concern

20
🫧

Microplastic release during use

Limited concern

70

Low concern for standard monofilament with no coating triggers.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Berkley Trilene Big Game Braid

Berkley

Trilene Big Game Braid

Braided polyethylene fishing line

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
🫧

Polyethylene microfiber shedding

Limited concern

70

Low concern; braided polyethylene is not a typical PFAS application.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Berkley Trilene XT Monofilament Fishing Line

Berkley

Trilene XT Monofilament Fishing Line

Nylon monofilament (extruded polymer)

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
🫧

Nylon polymer degradation and microplastic release

Limited concern

70
⚠️

UV stabilizer additives in polymer matrix

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or eye contact from monofilament filament

Moderate concern

45

Low concern for basic nylon line without water-repellent coating or special coatings.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More fishing line grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.