PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Stahl Artisan Hybrid Triply Roti Tawa Tawa Induction Base Non Stick Pan

Stahl · Cookware

Stahl Artisan Hybrid Triply Roti Tawa Tawa Induction Base Non Stick Pan

Bad

Wait for Stahl to reveal the non-stick coating formula.

Verdict: SkipUnspecified non-stick chemistry and silent brand PFAS stance create uncertainty; safe use possible with strict temperature control and known replacement timeline.

Stahl keeps the coating formula secret and hasn't disclosed PFAS information. Without details on what's on the pan, you can't know if PFAS is present.

The safe swap

Pyrex Ceramic Cookware Set

Pyrex

Pyrex Ceramic Cookware Set

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Non-stick coating composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk

Stahl does not disclose whether the coating is Teflon-type coating-based. If Teflon-type coating is present, overheating above 500°F can release toxic fumes; typical home cooking below 375°F mitigates this, but the lack of transparency prevents definitive risk assessment.

70/ 100
🍂

Coating degradation and microplastic/flake ingestion

Budget non-stick coatings are prone to chipping and peeling within 2-3 years, especially with metal utensils or dishwasher use. Ingestion of small coating flakes over time is a documented concern; regular visual inspection and timely replacement are essential.

20/ 100
🔩

Aluminum leaching from core layer

The triply base includes an aluminum core. In acidic foods (tomatoes, citrus, vinegar) at moderate temperatures, some aluminum leaching is possible but typically minimal in short cooking times. Risk is low compared to pure aluminum cookware, but cumulative dietary aluminum intake should be monitored.

70/ 100
🏷️

Brand transparency and recall responsiveness

Stahl's lack of public safety disclosure, PFAS stance communication, or certification history limits consumer ability to verify compliance with international food safety standards. This is not a documented hazard but a transparency gap that elevates perceived risk.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Stainless steel leachables (nickel and chromium)

Food-grade stainless steel in the triply construction is unlikely to leach nickel or chromium into food under normal cooking conditions. No specific brand testing or reports of contamination from Stahl cookware are publicly available.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This Stahl tawa combines a steel triply base (stainless steel exterior, aluminum core, stainless steel interior) with an unspecified non-stick coating. The triply construction is a positive design choice for even heat distribution and durability. However, Stahl does not publicly disclose the non-stick coating chemistry on product pages or packaging, leaving the Teflon-type coating vs. ceramic vs. proprietary formulation unknown. This opacity is the core safety gap for this product.

The brand's record and disclosure

Stahl is an Indian cookware brand with no publicly documented PFAS transparency initiatives, third-party certifications (such as GOTS, Oeko-Tex, or NSF), or independent safety audit history available in consumer records. The brand does not appear to have issued statements on non-stick coating safety or replacement schedules. No major recalls specific to Stahl non-stick coatings have been widely reported, but the absence of disclosure makes it difficult to assess the company's commitment to safety transparency.

How it compares in its category

Compared to premium non-stick cookware brands (GreenPan, Our Place, Caraway) that disclose ceramic or Teflon-type coating-free formulations, Stahl occupies a budget-tier position with minimal safety communication. Compared to basic stainless steel or cast iron alternatives, this product trades durability and transparency for convenience. The triply base design is a competitive strength, but it does not offset the coating ambiguity.

If you buy it

Never heat this pan above 350-375°F (176-190°C) to avoid accelerated non-stick degradation and potential fume release if Teflon-type coating is present. Inspect the coating every 6-12 months for scratches, discoloration, or peeling; discard and replace if damage appears. Hand-wash only with soft sponges; avoid metal utensils and dishwashers. Plan to replace this tawa every 2-3 years depending on use frequency, as budget non-stick coatings degrade faster than premium alternatives.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Stahl has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.