PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Swix Skin Impregnation

Swix · Ski & Sports Wax

Swix Skin Impregnation

Poor

Ski base treatment with likely PFAS use but unconfirmed by brand.

Verdict · SkipFluorocarbon water-repellent coating treatment likely contains PFAS; brand silence on composition and safety limits transparency. Use with awareness of environmental/health trade-offs.

Swix Skin Impregnation is a fluorocarbon water-repellent coating for ski bases. Swix does not disclose PFAS content, though fluorocarbon treatments typically contain PFAS.

The better-graded swap

Dominator FFC 1 Glide Wax

Dominator

Dominator FFC 1 Glide Wax

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Fluorocarbon-based water-repellent coating treatment for ski/snowboard bases

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (thermal degradation)

If the fluorocarbon treatment is heated during storage, transport, or near heat sources, Teflon-type coating can decompose and release fumes (polymer fume fever risk at high temperatures). Ski bases are typically stored at room temperature, so this is low-probability but should be considered if left in hot vehicles or near radiators.

70/ 100
💨

Inhalation exposure during application

Aerosol or powder impregnation products can shed fine particles during spraying or rubbing onto base material. No specific occupational exposure data is published for this product; applicators and users should use respiratory protection and ensure ventilation.

70/ 100
⚠️

Aquatic ecotoxicity and bioaccumulation

Fluorocarbon water-repellent coating treatments wash into snow and water during use and leach into groundwater from contaminated sites. These compounds are known persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) pollutants; ski resorts and winter athletes collectively contribute significant PFAS loading to watersheds.

20/ 100
⚠️

Skin and eye irritation from direct contact

Impregnation products may contain surfactants or solvents as carriers; direct contact with skin or eyes during application or accidental splashing could cause irritation. Product label (if available) should be consulted for first-aid guidance.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bioaccumulation in fish and wildlife near ski areas

PFAS from fluorocarbon ski waxes and treatments have been detected in elevated concentrations in fish, birds, and mammals in alpine and near-resort watersheds across North America and Europe, indicating chronic environmental exposure.

45/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Swix Skin Impregnation is a fluorocarbon-based water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment applied to ski and snowboard base materials to improve glide and water shedding in wet snow conditions. Fluorocarbon chemistry typically relies on Teflon-type coating (polytetrafluoroethylene) or related fluorinated compounds that bond to the porous base material. The trade-off is water repellency against potential PFAS accumulation in the product and release into snow/water during use and laundering.

The brand's record and disclosure

Swix has not publicly disclosed the specific chemical composition or PFAS content of this product, nor has the company issued statements about phasing fluorocarbon treatments or adopting PFAS-free alternatives. The brand has no known third-party certifications (such as bluesign, GOTS, or OEKO-TEX) for this treatment. This silence is notable given growing industry scrutiny of PFAS in outdoor gear and increasing regulatory pressure in Europe and North America.

How it compares in its category

Fluorocarbon water-repellent coating treatments remain standard in ski base waxes and impregnation products because alternative water repellents (silicone, hydrocarbon-based waxes, or paraffin blends) do not match durability or glide performance in competitive or high-use contexts. Some smaller brands and ski manufacturers are experimenting with PFAS-free formulations, but performance data and long-term durability claims are still emerging. For recreational use, wax-only or non-fluorinated base maintenance is viable; for racing or frequent wet-snow use, fluorocarbon products still dominate the market.

If you buy it

Apply in a well-ventilated area or outdoors to minimize inhalation of any aerosolized particles or volatile components during application. Store in a cool, dry place away from prolonged heat exposure. Reapply annually or per manufacturer guidance depending on use intensity. Disposal should follow local hazardous-waste guidelines; do not pour excess product down drains, as it will persist in aquatic environments and accumulate bioaccumulate in wildlife.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Swix has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Ski & Sports Wax

Swix PS10 Yellow Wax

Swix

PS10 Yellow Wax

Hydrocarbon-based ski wax (paraffin/synthetic blend)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade84Excellent
⚠️

Combustion by-products during hot application

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin and eye contact irritation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Ingestion toxicity (accidental exposure)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microabrasive particulates from worn base or scraping

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

Swix PS7 Violet Ski Snowboard Glide Wax

Swix

PS7 Violet Ski Snowboard Glide Wax

Hydrocarbon wax blend (paraffin/synthetic hydrocarbon base)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from heating

Limited concern

70
💨

Inhalation of wax dust during application

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

Maplus Arctic Base Fluor Free 1 kg

Maplus

Arctic Base Fluor Free 1 kg

ski wax base, fluorine-free formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
💨

Hydrocarbon volatiles and inhalation risk

Limited concern

70
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

More ski & sports wax grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.