PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall4/ 100Bad
TArte Maracuja Juicy Lip Vinyl

Tarte · Lip Balm & Long-Wear Lipstick

TArte Maracuja Juicy Lip Vinyl

Poor

Skip due to waterproof formulation and no PFAS disclosure.

Verdict · SkipVinyl polymer waterproof base carries PFAS risk; Tarte offers no transparency on fluorochemical content or safety testing.

Tarte's waterproof lip gloss uses a vinyl polymer base, a category where PFAS water-resistant coatings are common. The brand discloses nothing about PFAS content or avoidance.

The better-graded swap

Charlotte Tilbury Mini Pillow Talk Lip Kit - Pillow Talk Medium

Charlotte Tilbury

Charlotte Tilbury Mini Pillow Talk Lip Kit - Pillow Talk Medium

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Vinyl polymer (waterproof lip gloss base)

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What TArte Maracuja Juicy Lip Vinyl is made of, ingredients and materials

Tarte Maracuja Juicy Lip Vinyl uses a vinyl polymer backbone designed for waterproof, long-wear coverage. Vinyl polymers in cosmetics are synthetic plastics that form a film on the lip; when formulated for water resistance without disclosed alternatives, they often rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve that barrier function. The 'vinyl' descriptor typically signals a film-forming resin rather than a traditional wax-oil emulsion, which raises questions about what water-repelling chemistry is actually doing the work.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Vinyl polymer lip coatings are typically water-resistant due to fluorochemical additives; Tarte provides no disclosure, making PFAS presence probable given the product's waterproof claim and the chemical class's reliance on such compounds.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and irritants

The 'Maracuja' variant includes fragrance and flavoring agents (passionfruit); lip products in direct contact with sensitive mucous membrane can trigger contact dermatitis or stinging in sensitive individuals, especially if applied frequently.

70/ 100
⚠️

Polymer film ingestion risk

Vinyl-based lip products are designed not to transfer, but residual amounts are ingested during eating and drinking; chronic low-level vinyl polymer ingestion has not been formally studied, making the long-term safety of this route unclear.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No specific recalls or test reports document heavy metal contamination in this product line, but vinyl lip formulas may use synthetic iron oxides or mica-based pigments that require oversight; Tarte does not publish third-party pigment testing.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public data suggests formaldehyde-releasing preservatives in this product, but Tarte does not disclose full preservative systems, so the absence of evidence is not confirmation of absence.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Tarte does not publicly disclose PFAS content or commit to PFAS-free formulations across its lip product line. The brand does not appear on major certifications like EWG VERIFIED or Cradle to Cradle that would indicate rigorous chemical screening. While Tarte markets 'clean beauty' messaging, no transparent testing data for this specific vinyl formula is available in regulatory databases or third-party audits.

How it compares in its category

Most long-wear lip products carry some chemical complexity, but PFAS-free alternatives exist (e.g., silicone-based formulas without fluorochemicals, or wax-resin blends from brands with disclosed testing). Tarte's silence on fluorochemicals in a waterproof vinyl product places it below brands that explicitly test for and exclude PFAS. Comparable non-vinyl long-wear lipsticks from competitors typically cost the same and offer clearer ingredient transparency.

If you buy it

Apply only to lips; do not ingest or use near the mouth if you have a habit of lip-biting that leads to ingestion. Store away from heat (above 25°C), as polymer films can soften or degrade. Replace after 12 months or if the formula becomes sticky, thick, or separates, as these signs indicate breakdown of the polymer matrix. Wash your hands after application to limit dermal contact with the vinyl base.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Tarte has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to TArte Maracuja Juicy Lip Vinyl?

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss

Becca Cosmetics

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components
  • Liquid lipstick, likely pigments, oils, and waxes
  • Fragrance allergens or sensitizers
  • Natural waxes and oils (beeswax, plant oils, pigments)
  • Lead

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More lip balm & long-wear lipstick grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.