PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Tommy Hilfiger Men's Performance Hooded Jacket

Tommy Hilfiger · Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Tommy Hilfiger Men's Performance Hooded Jacket

Bad

Performance hooded jacket, PFAS risk unclear due to water-repellent coating.

Verdict · SkipPolyester blend with water-repellent coating carries possible PFAS and formaldehyde risks; Tommy Hilfiger has not disclosed water-repellent coating chemistry. Manageable with informed care.

Performance jackets often have water-repellent coating treatments that may contain PFAS, but Tommy Hilfiger doesn't publicly disclose coating chemistry. Third-party verification isn't available.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester blend with water-repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition

Tommy Hilfiger does not disclose whether this jacket uses PFAS-based or non-fluorochemical water-repellent coating. PFAS-containing finishes are still common in performance apparel; non-disclosure raises concern but does not confirm presence.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle release

Water-repellent coating coatings shed particles with repeated washing and wear, particularly when tumble dried or exposed to high heat. Risk is low-level and manageable through cold-water washing and air drying.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde violations on record for Tommy Hilfiger apparel. Polyester-blend jackets typically use minimal formaldehyde if any, but low-cost finishes can contain trace residues; washing before wear reduces this risk.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Tommy Hilfiger apparel generally meets EU and US dye safety standards. No specific recalls or violations for azo dyes or cadmium/lead in this product line are on record.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony (a catalyst used in polyester production) is not typically a concern in finished apparel; it is not bioavailable under normal wear conditions.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket is a polyester blend with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer surface. water-repellent coating coatings are typically fluorochemical-based (PFAS-related) or paraffin-based; Tommy Hilfiger has not publicly disclosed which chemistry is used on this model. Polyester itself is stable under normal wear, but the finish degrades with washing and wear, potentially releasing particles or coating residues over time.

The brand's record and disclosure

Tommy Hilfiger (owned by PVH Corp) does not publicly commit to PFAS-free water-repellent coating finishes or disclose which water-repellent chemistry is used in individual products. The brand has made some sustainability pledges but remains silent on fluorochemical alternatives in performance apparel. No major safety recalls or formaldehyde violations specific to Tommy Hilfiger jackets are on public record, suggesting baseline compliance with apparel standards.

How it compares in its category

This product is positioned as performance-grade casual wear, typical of mass-market outdoor jackets. Premium alternatives (Arc'teryx, Patagonia) increasingly disclose PFAS-free or low-PFAS water-repellent coating use; budget and mid-tier brands like Tommy Hilfiger often do not. The lack of disclosure is the differentiator here, not the material itself, which is standard polyester construction.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently and in cold water to slow water-repellent coating degradation and any potential leaching or fiber shedding. Do not tumble dry or expose to high heat, as this can damage the coating and release volatile residues. Replace the jacket when water no longer beads on the surface, typically 2-4 years with normal wear. If you have sensitivities to fragrance or chemical finishes, wash once before wearing to reduce residual coating odor.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Tommy Hilfiger has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Carhartt Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

100% cotton jersey knit, untreated

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microfiber shedding

Limited concern

70

Basic cotton tee, lower PFAS concern with no waterproofing.

Starting grade for this product type

Carhartt Men's Relaxed Fit Midweight Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Relaxed Fit Midweight Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

100% cotton, no water-repellent finish

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Limited concern

70

Lower concern, plain cotton tee with no water-repellent coating treatment.

Starting grade for this product type

Carhartt Men's Force Color Enhanced Long Sleeve T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Force Color Enhanced Long Sleeve T-Shirt

100% cotton long-sleeve shirt

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes and dye residuals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Allergen dyes and color fastness

Limited concern

70

Lower concern, bare cotton apparel with no added treatments.

Starting grade for this product type

More waterproof sports undergarments grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.