Tommy Hilfiger Review, Is Tommy Hilfiger Non-Toxic?
Tommy Hilfiger averages 38 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 23 Tommy Hilfiger products graded as of October 2026, and none of them reach its 70 point pass mark.
Tommy Hilfiger grades Poor on our four-band scale. On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. See what every brand has published about PFAS for how that compares.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Does Tommy Hilfiger have PFAS, by category
Which Tommy Hilfiger products contain PFAS? Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
- cotton blend, no PFAS-typical finishes noted
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes (in colored polyester sections). The polyester component may be dyed with azo or disperse dyes…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- cotton/polyester blend dress shirt
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Formaldehyde / VOCs. Durable-press or easy-care finishes on cotton-polyester blends commonly use…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- 100% cotton shirting
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Formaldehyde / VOCs. Cotton dress shirts often receive formaldehyde-based finishing resins. Tommy Hilfiger…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- polyester/nylon blend swimwear, likely no water-repellent treatment
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes and dye allergens. Polyester/nylon blends commonly use disperse azo dyes for color fastness. No…
5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Seersucker cotton blend (typical, 100% cotton or cotton/polyester)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals. Seersucker is typically piece-dyed after weaving. Tommy Hilfiger does not disclose dye class…
5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Nylon blend swimsuit fabric, no documented water-repellent coating specified
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes and colorant migration. Nylon swimsuits are typically dyed with acid or reactive dyes. Low-quality…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Polyester blend swimsuit fabric
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Formaldehyde / VOCs. Polyester swimwear may contain trace formaldehyde-releasing finishes applied for wrinkle…
5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- polyamide/nylon blend (standard swimwear)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes and synthetic dyes. Polyamide swimwear commonly uses acid or disperse dyes; the signature stripe…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Nylon/polyamide blend (typical for swimwear)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes. Swimwear dyes are regulated in EU and US markets to exclude carcinogenic azo dyes, but Tommy…
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Cotton with wrinkle-resistant finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Formaldehyde / VOCs. Durable press finishes on cotton commonly use formaldehyde-releasing compounds. Low…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- polyester blend with water-repellent coating
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition. Tommy Hilfiger does not disclose…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- polyester blend with performance water-repellent coating treatment
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Fragrance and chemical finish volatiles, water-repellent coating-treated performance fabrics may off-gas…
- cotton blend with moisture-wicking finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes (synthetic color). Tommy Hilfiger polos use synthetic dyes in a range of colors; while regulated azo…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Cotton/polyester blend with non-iron finish (likely resin treatment)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Formaldehyde / VOCs. Non-iron dress shirts often use formaldehyde-based resins for wrinkle-lock. Residual…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- cotton blend with water-repellent coating treatment
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS. Cotton-blend pants with water-repellent coating treatment almost certainly contain fluorinated…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Cotton blend with wrinkle-resistant and stain-resistant finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Formaldehyde / VOCs. Cotton wrinkle-resistant finishes commonly use formaldehyde-releasing compounds. New…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Nylon/polyester blend with likely water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Microplastic shedding from fiber degradation. Nylon and polyester fibers degrade under UV, chlorine, salt…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Cotton/polyester blend twill with wrinkle-free and stain-resistant finishes
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Formaldehyde / VOCs. Cotton-polyester twill wrinkle-free treatments often use formaldehyde-based copolymers…
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- polyester blend with performance water-repellent coating finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes and colorant residues. Polyester textiles typically use disperse azo dyes; while regulated azo dyes…
5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Polyester blend with performance water-repellent coating finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS. Performance Tech water-repellent coating treatment almost certainly uses fluorinated compounds; no…
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Polyester/nylon blend with likely water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Microplastic shedding from polyester-nylon blend. Synthetic fibers break down and shed during washing and…
5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- polyester blend with moisture-wicking treatment
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS. Undisclosed wicking finish is standard vector for PFAS in performance apparel. Brand silence on…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- polyester blend with water-repellent coating/stain-resistant finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating - undisclosed chemistry. Performance polos…
What to buy instead Good or better, in the categories Tommy Hilfiger sells
- Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine
- Organic cotton, standard construction
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Formaldehyde / VOCs
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Tommy Hilfiger and PFAS, common questions
- Does Tommy Hilfiger have PFAS?
- Tommy Hilfiger averages 38 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 23 Tommy Hilfiger products graded as of October 2026, and none of them reach its 70 point pass mark. Grades are model-based estimates built from published materials, ingredients and disclosures, not lab tests.
- Is Tommy Hilfiger non-toxic?
- No Tommy Hilfiger product we graded reaches Good. The best of them is Tommy Hilfiger Boys' 8-20 Stretch Ivy Polo Shirt at 65/100.
- Which Tommy Hilfiger products should I avoid?
- The lowest-graded Tommy Hilfiger products we have scored are Tommy Hilfiger Men's TH Performance Lightweight Polo, Tommy Hilfiger Men's Regular Fit Wicking Polo, Tommy Hilfiger Women's Striped One-Piece Swimsuit. Each one links to the evidence behind its grade.
Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →