Tommy Hilfiger · Waterproof Sports Undergarments
Tommy Hilfiger Men's Regular Fit Performance Shirt
Performance apparel likely water-repellent coating-treated, PFAS risk unclear without disclosure.
Tommy Hilfiger doesn't disclose PFAS or water-repellent coating treatment details for this performance shirt. Polyester blends with water and stain resistance often use PFAS-based finishes.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
polyester blend with performance water-repellent coating treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Tommy Hilfiger Men's Regular Fit Shirt is made of, ingredients and materials
This shirt is a polyester blend (exact percentage not specified in typical product labeling) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the fabric surface. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on PFAS chemicals, though some brands have transitioned to PFAS-free alternatives; Tommy Hilfiger has not publicly disclosed which type is used on this garment. Polyester itself is a synthetic polymer with no inherent toxicant risk during normal wear, but the applied finish is the variable of concern.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Fragrance and chemical finish volatiles
Water-repellent coating-treated performance fabrics may off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during initial wear or when heated. This is not a documented health hazard at consumer exposure levels but can trigger respiratory sensitivity in chemically sensitive individuals.
What’s reassuring
Azo dyes and synthetic colorants
No recalls or documented issues specific to Tommy Hilfiger performance apparel colorants. Polyester dyes used in mass-market casual wear are generally compliant with consumer product safety standards, though no brand-specific testing data is publicly available.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
No evidence that this product line uses formaldehyde-based durable-press or wrinkle-resistant finishes. Performance water-repellent coating treatments are chemically distinct, but brand does not disclose all finishing agents.
Source, ATSDR ↗Antimony in polyester fiber
Antimony trioxide is a known catalyst in polyester production but is not shed during normal wear or laundering in concentrations that pose dermal or ingestion risk. No specific testing data for Tommy Hilfiger polyester shirts exists in public domain.
Microplastic shedding
Polyester sheds microfibers during washing, a known environmental concern, but this is not a direct consumer health hazard. No brand-specific data on shedding rate is available.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Tommy Hilfiger (owned by PVH Corp.) has not issued a transparent, public commitment to PFAS-free water-repellent coating treatments across its performance apparel lines, nor does it typically disclose water-repellent coating chemistry on product labels or websites. The brand has faced no major documented recalls or toxicant controversies specific to this product line. Without explicit PFAS-free certification or third-party testing data, the water-repellent coating treatment chemistry remains a black box for consumers.
How it compares in its category
Performance polyester shirts with water-repellent coating finishes are standard across the mid-market casual and athletic sector. Competitors like Columbia and some Patagonia lines have moved toward PFAS-free water repellency or clearly labeled their chemistry; Tommy Hilfiger lags in transparency. For consumers prioritizing low chemical exposure, brands with explicit PFAS-free water-repellent coating claims or certification (e.g., bluesign, OEKO-TEX STeP) offer more assurance, though at potentially higher price points.
If you buy it
Wash in cool water (below 60°C / 140°F) to minimize potential leaching of finish chemicals. Use mild detergent and avoid fabric softeners, which can interact with water-repellent coating coatings and reduce their efficacy. Expect the water-repellent finish to degrade over 20-30 washes; reapplication products are available but carry their own chemical exposure risk. If PFAS exposure is a personal health priority, contact Tommy Hilfiger directly to request water-repellent coating treatment disclosure before purchase.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Tommy Hilfiger has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Tommy Hilfiger Men's Regular Fit Performance Shirt?
- Cotton-blend knit jersey, uncoated
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes and synthetic colorants
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- cotton jersey, no applied finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes and colorant residues
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- 100% cotton jersey knit, untreated
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore waterproof sports undergarments grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.