PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall53/ 100Good
Wrangler Workwear Cargo Pants

Wrangler · Stain-Resistant Professional Workwear

Wrangler Workwear Cargo Pants

Good

Lower risk for basic workwear with no special treatments mentioned.

Verdict · SkipStandard cotton-polyester workwear with no disclosed chemical treatments; routine laundry care and normal wear pose minimal documented hazard.

Wrangler workwear cargo pants are standard cotton-polyester without water-resistant or stain-resistant finishes mentioned. No PFAS disclosure appears necessary for uncoated textiles, though Wrangler makes no PFAS commitment.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cotton/polyester blend, no disclosed coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Wrangler Workwear Cargo Pants is made of, ingredients and materials

Wrangler Workwear Cargo Pants are a cotton-polyester blend, typically 65% polyester and 35% cotton or similar ratios. Cotton provides breathability and comfort; polyester adds durability and wrinkle resistance without requiring chemical finishes like durable-press resins. No special water-resistant, stain-resistant, or antimicrobial coatings are disclosed on standard Wrangler work cargo lines, which reduces exposure to problematic chemical additives common in treated fabrics.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

Polyester-cotton blends in workwear commonly use disperse and reactive azo dyes. While regulated in many markets, residual azo dye leaching occurs with heavy washing and sweat exposure, particularly in darker shades. No specific Wrangler dye testing results are publicly available.

70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Antimony trioxide is a common polyester catalyst; trace residues can remain in the finished fabric. No evidence of excessive antimony contamination in Wrangler workwear, but testing data is not public. Skin contact from wear poses low migration risk under normal laundering.

70/ 100
🧴

Phthalates

Phthalate plasticizers may be present in synthetic dyes or seam-tape adhesives used in basic workwear. Exposure risk is low during wearing; migration increases with heat and abrasion. Wrangler does not publicly commit to phthalate-free formulations.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Standard cotton-polyester workwear typically does not undergo durable-press or crease-retention treatments that require high-formaldehyde resin finishes. Wrangler does not disclose such treatments on this product line, suggesting minimal formaldehyde risk.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Standard workwear cargo pants are not typically treated with flame retardants unless explicitly marketed as fire-resistant. Wrangler workwear does not appear to carry FR claims, so this hazard is not relevant.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Wrangler (VF Corporation subsidiary) has not published detailed chemical disclosure reports or sustainability certifications specific to workwear lines like these cargo pants. The brand does not explicitly market PFAS-free or chemical-restricted certifications for this product tier. VF Corporation has faced historical scrutiny on chemical management but has not announced widespread PFAS phase-out commitments as aggressively as some competitors. No major recalls or contamination incidents are on record for standard Wrangler workwear.

How it compares in its category

Basic cotton-polyester workwear is a conventional, lower-risk category within apparel. Wrangler's cargo pants sit in the mainstream tier, they lack premium certifications (GOTS, OEKO-TEX) but also avoid extreme chemical treatments typical of performance or outdoor gear. Competitors like Carhartt and Dickies occupy similar space with comparable transparency; higher-end workwear (e.g., Patagonia, REI Co-op) offer certified-safe alternatives at higher cost.

If you buy it

Wash in warm water with standard detergent; do not use fabric softener or bleach, which can degrade polyester and trigger leaching of residual dyes. Air dry or use low heat to preserve coating and elastic components. Inspect seams and crotch area annually for fraying or holes; replace when structural integrity declines. No special precautions needed during initial wear or storage beyond standard hygiene.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Wrangler has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More stain-resistant professional workwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.