Crock-Pot Review, Is Crock-Pot Non-Toxic?
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
Across 1 graded product, Crock-Pot averages Bad (15/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.
Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
Crock-Pot
Kitchen Slow Cooker Liner
nylon or polyester liner with unspecified coating
Teflon-type coating fume risk (from unspecified nonstick coating)
If the coating contains Teflon-type coating or similar Teflon-family coating, overheating…
Microplastic or fiber shedding
Repeated use and washing can degrade nylon or polyester fibers, especially if the coating…
Coating delamination or degradation over time
Nonstick coatings on fabric liners are inherently prone to wear, especially under…
PFAS
The 'non-stick' or 'heat-resistant' claims strongly suggest fluorinated compounds are…
Skip until Crock-Pot discloses coating chemistry.
⚠Nonstick, coating undisclosed
Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →