Do Kirkland parchment paper & baking liners have PFAS?
Kirkland parchment paper & baking liners average 20 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 4 Kirkland parchment paper & baking liners graded as of October 2026, below the 25 out of 100 median for the 52 other parchment paper & baking liners brands graded alongside it.
Kirkland parchment paper & baking liners average Bad on our four-band scale. None of them clear our buy threshold.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Which Kirkland parchment paper & baking liners contain PFAS? Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
- paper with unspecified silicone or Teflon-family coating non-stick coating
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Non-stick coating composition (undisclosed). Kirkland does not specify whether the coating is Teflon-type…
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- cellulose paper with unspecified non-stick coating
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Non-stick coating identity (fluorocarbon risk). Kirkland does not disclose whether the non-stick coating is…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- paper with non-stick coating, composition unspecified
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Coating thermal degradation and fume release. Unknown coating composition means unknowable fume profile above…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- paper with non-stick coating, unknown composition
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS. Non-stick parchment coatings commonly rely on PFAS chemistry per industry practice. Kirkland does not…
5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonBetter parchment paper & baking liners from other brands
Graded higher than the Kirkland average of 20.
- silicone-coated parchment paper
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Paper degradation and particulate shedding
- unbleached paper with silicone coating
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Silicone coating degradation at high heat
- bleached paper with silicone coating
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Paper degradation and fragmentation
The same question, asked of the other parchment paper & baking liners brands
Best average grade first. Kirkland averages 20.
See every Kirkland product we grade on the Kirkland brand page, or the full parchment paper & baking liners ranking.