PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall8/ 100Bad
Kirkland Signature Kirkland Non-Stick Parchment Paper

Kirkland · Parchment Paper & Baking Liners

Kirkland Signature Kirkland Non-Stick Parchment Paper

Bad

Skip until Kirkland discloses coating chemistry and PFAS status.

Verdict: SkipKirkland parchment paper's non-stick coating is undisclosed; PFAS concern is severe, but paper itself poses minimal other food-contact risks if used within temperature limits.

Parchment paper with unspecified non-stick treatment raises PFAS concern. Kirkland provides no coating details or safety claims, limiting consumer confidence in this product.

The safe swap

Parchment Baking Sheets | 3 x 24 sheets

Seventh Generation

Parchment Baking Sheets | 3 x 24 sheets

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

paper with non-stick coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

60/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Coating thermal degradation and fume release

Unknown coating composition means unknowable fume profile above safe temperatures. If coating contains perfluorinated compounds (PFAS-based), heating above polymer decomposition point (typically 500F+, but micro-emissions can occur lower) risks inhalation exposure; no testing data for this specific product is public.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic or coating particle shedding into food

Worn, degraded, or improperly stored parchment can shed particles of coating into oily or wet foods. Kirkland provides no guidance on coating durability or replacement intervals, so users may reuse past safe lifespan.

70/ 100
🍳

Migration of coating additives into fatty foods

Non-stick coatings often include slip agents, adhesion promoters, or hydrophobic compounds. Without disclosed chemistry, the migration risk under typical baking (especially with fatty foods like meats or pastries) cannot be ruled out, though paper-coating migration is generally lower than plastic-film risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Mold or bacterial growth on stored rolls

Parchment paper itself resists microbial growth, but if stored in damp conditions, the paper substrate can support mold. This is a storage/use issue, not a manufacturing hazard specific to Kirkland.

95/ 100

Bleach or processing chemical residues in paper substrate

Kirkland does not specify whether the paper is chlorine-bleached or oxygen-bleached. Residual chlorine compounds (dioxins) in bleached paper are rare in food-contact products meeting FDA standards, but the lack of transparency extends to substrate choice as well.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Kirkland Non-Stick Parchment Paper is cellulose paper substrate coated with an undisclosed non-stick treatment. The coating chemistry, whether fluorinated (PFAS), silicone-based, or other, is not publicly specified by Kirkland on packaging or marketing materials. This opacity is the core safety problem: parchment's safety hinges entirely on what that coating is and how stable it remains under heat and moisture.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kirkland (Costco's house brand) has not publicly committed to PFAS-free non-stick coatings or disclosed the chemistry of this product's treatment. No third-party certifications (e.g., SFI, FSC, or PFAS-free claims) appear on product documentation. Kirkland's silence on non-stick coating composition is standard for many parchment brands but reflects an industry-wide lack of transparency rather than Kirkland-specific misconduct.

How it compares in its category

Kirkland parchment occupies the mid-market tier. Competing products (If You Care, Unbleached by Nature) explicitly market PFAS-free or fluorocarbon-free coatings; premium brands sometimes cite silicone or mineral-based treatments. Kirkland's refusal to specify is more evasive than leading alternatives but not unique among grocery-store parchment. Uncoated parchment or wax paper exist as lower-risk alternatives, though they lack non-stick convenience.

If you buy it

Use only below 420F (paper charring risk above that). Never use directly on open flame or under broilers. Store in cool, dry conditions; moisture can degrade the coating and promote mold. Replace rolls showing visible coating wear, discoloration, or grease staining that resists cleaning. Consider it a convenience item, not a daily staple, until Kirkland discloses coating type; if PFAS exposure is a household concern, seek explicitly PFAS-free-labeled alternatives.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Kirkland has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Parchment Paper & Baking Liners

Parchment Baking Sheets | 3 x 24 sheets

Seventh Generation

Parchment Baking Sheets | 3 x 24 sheets

bleached paper with silicone coating

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
🫧

Silicone coating degradation and microparticles

Limited concern

70

Heat-induced breakdown of paper fibers

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. PFAS-free claim backed by MADE SAFE cert.

MADE SAFE

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Zulay Kitchen 200 Pcs Unbleached Non-Stick Baking Parchment Paper Sheets for Oven

Seventh Generation

Zulay Kitchen 200 Pcs Unbleached Non-Stick Baking Parchment Paper Sheets for Oven

unbleached cellulose paper, silicone coating

PFAS Grade50Good
Overall Grade38Poor

Silicone coating degradation at high heat

Limited concern

70
🍳

Migration of coating additives into fatty foods

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding during handling or cooking

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Unbleached parchment with silicone coating; PFAS risk lower than conventional brands.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Parchment Paper Roll

Seventh Generation

Parchment Paper Roll

wood pulp with silicone-based coating

PFAS Grade50Good
Overall Grade42Poor

Silicone coating degradation under high heat

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Ink or printing chemical migration

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Seventh Generation's PFAS-free claim is credible but unverified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More parchment paper & baking liners grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.