44Poor

Modibodi Review, Is Modibodi Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 4 graded products, Modibodi averages Poor (44/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. 1 of its products grade Good or better. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Worth buying from Modibodi Good or better, safest first

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

Modibodi

Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

organic cotton blend with water-resistant coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent

Water-resistant coating degradation

Non-PFAS synthetic coatings degrade over time with washing and heat exposure. As coating…

70
⚠️

Microbial growth and odor with improper care

Extended wear without washing, or storage in damp conditions, can promote bacterial and…

70

Lower concern. MADE SAFE certified, PFAS-free claimed and tested.

MADE SAFE

Lab test found no PFAS

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Brief Black

Modibodi

Basic Mid-Rise Brief Black

Organic cotton with waterproof leak-proof lining

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade0Bad
♾️

PFAS

The polymer or coating layer is not disclosed; it may contain acrylate-based…

70
⚠️

Microorganism growth if improperly dried

The waterproof barrier can trap moisture if the product is stored damp or laundered in…

70

Coating degradation over repeated washing

Polymer or laminate waterproof linings degrade with age and heat exposure. As the coating…

20
⚠️

Contact dermatitis or skin irritation

Synthetic lining chemicals or undisclosed finish residues on organic cotton may trigger…

70

Waterproof period underwear; PFAS risk unknown, brand silent on treatment.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Modibodi Classic Full Period Briefs

Modibodi

Classic Full Period Briefs

Organic cotton blend with unspecified waterproof/absorbent coating

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade0Bad
🏷️

Undisclosed waterproof coating chemistry

The waterproof layer is the product's core function but remains chemically unspecified.…

20
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Organic cotton blends may still receive durable-press or cross-linking finishes during…

70
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

GOTS certification restricts certain azo dyes in organic fiber dyeing, but applied…

70
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

Repeated washing and body heat degrade synthetic waterproof coatings over time…

45

Skip until Modibodi discloses waterproof coating chemistry.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Modibodi Basic Full Period Brief

Modibodi

Basic Full Period Brief

Organic cotton, lycra blend with waterproof gusset treatment

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade7Bad
🍳

Synthetic polymer leaching from lycra/gusset coating

Lycra at body temperature poses minimal leaching risk in established research. The…

70

Skin sensitization or irritation from coating degradation

Individual users report occasional contact dermatitis with period underwear, typically…

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic components

Lycra fiber can shed microplastics with repeated washing, contributing to aquatic…

70

Waterproof period underwear; PFAS use in gusset unclear from brand.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →