PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall7/ 100Bad
Modibodi Basic Full Period Brief

Modibodi · Period Underwear

Modibodi Basic Full Period Brief

Poor

Waterproof period underwear; PFAS use in gusset unclear from brand.

Verdict: SkipOrganic cotton base is safer than synthetic alternatives, but unclear PFAS use in waterproof gusset and limited brand transparency warrant cautious purchase with proper maintenance.

Modibodi makes absorbent period briefs with waterproof backing. Brand does not disclose PFAS use in waterproofing treatments, raising concern for water-resistant textiles.

The safe swap

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

Modibodi

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Organic cotton, lycra blend with waterproof gusset treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🍳

Synthetic polymer leaching from lycra/gusset coating

Lycra at body temperature poses minimal leaching risk in established research. The waterproof gusset coating is the concern: unnamed Teflon-family coating or polyurethane-based waterproofing can degrade and migrate into fabric over time, especially with body heat and moisture. No specific testing of this product has been published.

70/ 100

Skin sensitization or irritation from coating degradation

Individual users report occasional contact dermatitis with period underwear, typically linked to gusset coatings or dyes. Modibodi's anonymous coating increases risk of unidentified allergens. Anecdotal reports exist but no clinical study of this specific product.

45/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic components

Lycra fiber can shed microplastics with repeated washing, contributing to aquatic pollution. The waterproof gusset coating may also shed particulates as it degrades. Volume is small per garment but cumulative across many wash cycles over product life.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

Organic cotton body reduces dye hazard, but no specific information on colorant chemistry in this product's black or dark dye lots. Standard GOTS organic certification requires safer dye limits, lowering risk compared to conventional cotton.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Modibodi does not disclose use of formaldehyde-based resin finishes. Organic cotton processing typically avoids these, but the waterproof gusset coating chemical identity is undisclosed, so formaldehyde risk cannot be ruled out.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Modibodi Basic uses organic cotton in the main brief body, which eliminates pesticide residues common in conventional cotton underwear. The gusset is treated with an unnamed waterproof coating to prevent leakage; this is where PFAS concern arises, as many waterproofing treatments in period underwear rely on PFAS "forever chemicals". The lycra blend provides stretch and durability but is a synthetic polymer with no documented hazards in this product class at normal wear levels. The organic cotton certification reduces chemical exposure compared to untreated or conventionally grown alternatives.

The brand's record and disclosure

Modibodi has not publicly disclosed the chemical identity of its waterproof gusset treatment, which is a transparency gap on a product marketed as sustainable and body-safe. The brand does not list PFAS-free certification or testing results for PFAS on this product. No major recalls or documented safety incidents involving this brief have been reported to consumer safety databases. The lack of proactive PFAS communication is notable given industry movement toward transparency on this hazard class.

How it compares in its category

Period underwear market leaders vary widely: some brands (e.g., Thinx, Knix) have committed to PFAS-free gussets, while others remain silent. Modibodi's use of organic cotton is a competitive advantage over polyester-heavy competitors, but the unnamed waterproof treatment puts it in a middle tier of transparency. Non-toxic alternatives include period underwear with named non-PFAS waterproof films or those using washable inserts with separate synthetic layers. Modibodi is positioned as premium eco-conscious but lacks the chemical disclosure that matches that positioning.

If you buy it

Wash before first use to reduce potential chemical residues or manufacturing debris. Use warm (not hot) water and gentle detergent; high heat can degrade the waterproof coating and potentially release trapped chemicals. Air dry rather than machine dry to extend coating life. Replace every 1-2 years as the waterproof treatment degrades with repeated washing; worn-out coating may lose efficacy and increase microleakage risk. If you experience skin irritation (rash, redness, itching), discontinue use, as sensitivity to coating chemicals is possible though uncommon.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Modibodi has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Period Underwear

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

Modibodi

Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

organic cotton blend with water-resistant coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent

Water-resistant coating degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth and odor with improper care

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. MADE SAFE certified, PFAS-free claimed and tested.

MADE SAFE

Lab test found no PFAS

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

Lola

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

organic cotton with water-resistant treatment

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
🫧

Water-resistant coating degradation and microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Allergen sensitivity to cotton or treatment additives

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; PFAS-free certified, organic cotton base.

MADE SAFE CertifiedOEKO-TEX Standard 100

Lab test found no PFAS

Organic Cotton Period Underwear

Lola

Organic Cotton Period Underwear

organic cotton with gusseted absorbent layer

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade58Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes and color fastness

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Organic cotton core, no water-resistant treatment disclosed.

Risky category by default

More period underwear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.