Do Tommy Hilfiger waterproof sports undergarments have PFAS?
Tommy Hilfiger waterproof sports undergarments average 20 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 8 Tommy Hilfiger waterproof sports undergarments graded as of October 2026, below the 47 out of 100 median for the 7 other waterproof sports undergarments brands graded alongside it.
Tommy Hilfiger waterproof sports undergarments average Bad on our four-band scale. None of them clear our buy threshold.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Which Tommy Hilfiger waterproof sports undergarments contain PFAS? Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
- polyester blend with water-repellent coating
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition. Tommy Hilfiger does not disclose…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- polyester blend with performance water-repellent coating treatment
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Fragrance and chemical finish volatiles, water-repellent coating-treated performance fabrics may off-gas…
- cotton blend with moisture-wicking finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes (synthetic color). Tommy Hilfiger polos use synthetic dyes in a range of colors; while regulated azo…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- cotton blend with water-repellent coating treatment
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS. Cotton-blend pants with water-repellent coating treatment almost certainly contain fluorinated…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- polyester blend with performance water-repellent coating finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes and colorant residues. Polyester textiles typically use disperse azo dyes; while regulated azo dyes…
5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Polyester blend with performance water-repellent coating finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS. Performance Tech water-repellent coating treatment almost certainly uses fluorinated compounds; no…
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- polyester blend with moisture-wicking treatment
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS. Undisclosed wicking finish is standard vector for PFAS in performance apparel. Brand silence on…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- polyester blend with water-repellent coating/stain-resistant finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating - undisclosed chemistry. Performance polos…
Better waterproof sports undergarments from other brands
Graded higher than the Tommy Hilfiger average of 20.
- Cotton-blend knit jersey, uncoated
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes and synthetic colorants
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- cotton jersey, no applied finish
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes and colorant residues
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- 100% cotton jersey knit, untreated
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonThe same question, asked of the other waterproof sports undergarments brands
Best average grade first. Tommy Hilfiger averages 20.
See every Tommy Hilfiger product we grade on the Tommy Hilfiger brand page, or the full waterproof sports undergarments ranking.