Rho Glove vs Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's: which is safer?

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's is the clear pick. Arc'teryx Rho Glove carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Arc'teryx Rho Glove

Arc'teryx

Rho Glove

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 12/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Merino wool blend with water-repellent coating finish

Confidence

45%

Possiblewater-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) fluorinated compounds

PossibleMicrofiber shedding from synthetic blend components

Our pick

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

Patagonia

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 82/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Polyester fleece (recycled)

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal pigments

PossibleMicroplastic shedding during wash

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Durable water repellent (DWR) fluorinated compounds and Microfiber shedding from synthetic blend components on the Arc'teryx and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag Azo dyes and heavy metal pigments and Microplastic shedding during wash on the Patagonia and not on the Arc'teryx.
  • The Arc'teryx is Merino wool blend with DWR finish where the Patagonia is Polyester fleece (recycled), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Arc'teryx grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof winter gloves, see the full ranking