Women's Drive Interlace Run Bra vs Women's Quarter Crew Socks (6 Pairs): which is safer?
PUMA Women's Quarter Crew Socks (6 Pairs) is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Brooks
Women's Drive Interlace Run Bra
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Likelywater-repellent coating finish (likely fluorinated compounds, PFAS class)
PossibleFormaldehyde resins in dyes and finishes
PossibleAzo dyes
Our pick
Puma
Women's Quarter Crew Socks (6 Pairs)
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes
PossibleFormaldehyde resins (finishing agents)
ReportedMicroplastic shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag DWR finish (likely fluorinated compounds, PFAS class), Formaldehyde resins in dyes and finishes and Elastane (spandex) degradation and microfiber shedding on the Brooks and not on the Puma.
- We flag Formaldehyde resins (finishing agents) and Microplastic shedding on the Puma and not on the Brooks.
- Both carry a flag for Azo dyes, so neither choice avoids it.
- The Brooks is nylon, elastane, polyester with DWR finish where the Puma is Cotton/polyester blend socks, no waterproofing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Puma is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Brooks grade, at 45% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More sports performance undergarments, see the full ranking