Fall Line Leather Ski Gloves vs Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's: which is safer?

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's is the clear pick. Hestra Fall Line Leather Ski Gloves carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Hestra Fall Line Leather Ski Gloves

Hestra

Fall Line Leather Ski Gloves

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 8/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

leather with water-repellent treatment

Confidence

55%

PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating finish (fluorinated water repellent)

PossibleCoating degradation and leaching over time

PossibleAzo dyes in leather coloring

Our pick

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

Patagonia

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 82/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Polyester fleece (recycled)

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal pigments

PossibleMicroplastic shedding during wash

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag PFAS in DWR finish (fluorinated water repellent), Coating degradation and leaching over time and Azo dyes in leather coloring on the Hestra and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag Azo dyes and heavy metal pigments and Microplastic shedding during wash on the Patagonia and not on the Hestra.
  • The Hestra is leather with water-repellent treatment where the Patagonia is Polyester fleece (recycled), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof winter gloves, see the full ranking