Men's Mesh Jersey Performance Wicking No Fly Boxer Briefs vs Women's Quarter Crew Socks (6 Pairs): which is safer?
PUMA Women's Quarter Crew Socks (6 Pairs) is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
New Balance
Men's Mesh Jersey Performance Wicking No Fly Boxer Briefs
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes in polyester fabric
PossibleFormaldehyde-based resins in moisture-wicking finish
LikelyFinish degradation and off-gassing over time
Our pick
Puma
Women's Quarter Crew Socks (6 Pairs)
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes
PossibleFormaldehyde resins (finishing agents)
ReportedMicroplastic shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes in polyester fabric, Formaldehyde-based resins in moisture-wicking finish, Finish degradation and off-gassing over time and Microplastic shedding from mesh on the New Balance and not on the Puma.
- We flag Azo dyes, Formaldehyde resins (finishing agents) and Microplastic shedding on the Puma and not on the New Balance.
- The New Balance is polyester mesh with moisture-wicking finish where the Puma is Cotton/polyester blend socks, no waterproofing, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Puma is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the New Balance grade, at 45% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More sports performance undergarments, see the full ranking